Active Users:245 Time:21/05/2024 11:33:15 AM
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM
Otherwise, I'm going to have to ask that you stop painting with such broad brushes. Plenty of Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians, and Anglicans would disagree with that statement.

Most Episcopalians would disagree with that statement. It's really only true about a small segment of Protestantism.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1185 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 473 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 437 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 707 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 440 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 623 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 696 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 677 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 872 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 402 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 985 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 344 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 763 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 634 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 726 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 655 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 888 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 842 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 718 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 375 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 746 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 915 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 652 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 616 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1042 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 785 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 398 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 797 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 588 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 401 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 632 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 776 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 660 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 804 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 576 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 771 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 653 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 764 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 380 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 568 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 403 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 616 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 415 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 705 Views

Reply to Message