Active Users:628 Time:21/03/2026 04:19:10 PM
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM
Otherwise, I'm going to have to ask that you stop painting with such broad brushes. Plenty of Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians, and Anglicans would disagree with that statement.

Most Episcopalians would disagree with that statement. It's really only true about a small segment of Protestantism.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1465 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 601 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 569 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 974 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 569 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 901 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 974 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 935 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 1169 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 521 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1268 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 467 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 1060 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 956 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 1004 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 916 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 1166 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 1109 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 987 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 491 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 1032 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 1188 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 925 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 888 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1303 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 1029 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 507 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 1082 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 843 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 524 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 882 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 1066 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 933 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 1063 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 830 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 1041 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 916 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 1024 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 499 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 844 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 571 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 917 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 532 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 999 Views

Reply to Message