Active Users:482 Time:02/05/2025 04:27:34 PM
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians Roland00 Send a noteboard - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM
Otherwise, I'm going to have to ask that you stop painting with such broad brushes. Plenty of Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians, and Anglicans would disagree with that statement.

Most Episcopalians would disagree with that statement. It's really only true about a small segment of Protestantism.


Original Sin (or what Orthodox consider Ancestral Sin) is ever present and via its very nature separate us from God. It is only through the grace of Jesus Christ that we can re-establish a communion with god.

Roman Catholics very much believe in Original Sin.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1332 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 532 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 497 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 847 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 498 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 780 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 832 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 815 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 1014 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 459 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1129 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 401 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 915 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 779 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 864 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 796 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 1041 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 985 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 858 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 432 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 877 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 1050 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 789 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 759 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1179 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 920 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 456 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 945 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 722 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 455 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 763 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 922 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 798 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 943 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 718 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 911 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 791 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 894 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 428 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 718 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 460 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 751 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 461 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 832 Views

Reply to Message