Active Users:1014 Time:18/09/2026 08:43:36 AM
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians Roland00 Send a noteboard - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM
Otherwise, I'm going to have to ask that you stop painting with such broad brushes. Plenty of Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians, and Anglicans would disagree with that statement.

Most Episcopalians would disagree with that statement. It's really only true about a small segment of Protestantism.


Original Sin (or what Orthodox consider Ancestral Sin) is ever present and via its very nature separate us from God. It is only through the grace of Jesus Christ that we can re-establish a communion with god.

Roman Catholics very much believe in Original Sin.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1544 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 637 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 613 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 1044 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 609 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 982 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 1046 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 1006 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 1251 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 564 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1329 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 526 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 1140 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 1023 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 1071 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 993 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 1242 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 1179 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 1059 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 535 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 1102 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 1257 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 993 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 967 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1389 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 1106 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 549 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 1167 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 913 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 574 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 953 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 1139 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 1003 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 1137 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 904 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 1127 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 987 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 1098 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 539 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 923 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 612 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 1003 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 581 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 1067 Views

Reply to Message