Active Users:684 Time:19/12/2025 12:22:27 PM
Pittsburgh isn't a large market? That matters since the Pack instituted drafts and profit sharing? Joel Send a noteboard - 07/02/2011 09:34:03 AM
Way to judge the history of the league based on one subset of that history. Green Bay has more NFL championships than any other team with 13.(Second on that list? The Chicago Bears with 9) That sure puts them in the running for the name "Titletown" wouldn't you say?

Of course, a bunch of them are ancient history. So I'll give you this stat: The Packers are the current Super Bowl Champions. You're gonna be hearing us talk, and not because of the past, but because of the present. No one has more bragging rights than the Packers right now.

Also, the NFC Championship game featured two NFC North teams. Kind of a vindication of the conference, wouldn't you say? (As if it needed it, boasting the two most decorated programs in NFL history.)

I can see why you would hate both teams though. Steelers, the most championships of the Super Bowl era, Packers, the most of all time. And they don't even have the good taste to be from big markets, or teams constructed mostly in free agency. Just a couple of blue collar, draft and develop teams.

Yeah, because as a Denver fan I don't hear about (and live with) network refusal to air Broncos games until/unless they have double digit wins. I actually kinda like the pre-Lombardi Packers teams, but when Packers fans want to crow about how great they are, do they point to Curly Lambeau, Arnie Herber (perhaps the first "bombing" QB) or Don Hutson (a man who's forgotten more about receiving than most players will ever know; legend has it he used to spend hours practicing BAD passes)? No, they point to Lombardis "winning is the only thing and frostbite is for losers" philosophy. Which is almost comical since that's seemingly the last time Green Bay had a running game worthy of the name; they passed 75% of the time last night and Packers Sweeps were few to be found (the few times they did run they usually LOST yardage).

So if you want to toast the maverick indefatigable '20s and '30s darkhorses I'll drink to that; that's about the only time GB was the kind of team I liked instead of being a three yards and a cloud of dust (by air or ground it amounts to the same thing) team that rode amazing defenses to titles by any legal means necessary. Since Lombardi you've mostly been graceless winners who sneered at defeated opponents when you were winners at all. When we're counting titles though we should bear in mind that 3 of them are akin to the Yankees crowning themselves #1 after winning the ALCS; I still think my Oilers would've beaten you in '61, but we'll never know. It does put things in perspective though when you consider the Pack has so many titles in part for the same reason Chicago does: Because they've had 40 more years win them than most other teams. In 1960 they were all ancient history, and in 1996 they were again, but right now ya'll are on top, and I'm not taking anything away from that. It's just a little annoying to hear Packers fans making it sound like the NFL plays Lombardiball even when they don't win it all, and downright nauseating to see them yet again prancing around like one Super Bowl win means they invented the game. String together as many championships as you managed in the '60s (even if three of them were never contested by any of the AFL teams) and that level of arrogance might be justified. Right now you're the best team in the League by virtue of proving it on the field, but you're not the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Super Bowl XLV Pick 'Em: Pittsburgh Steelers vs. Green Bay Packers - 06/02/2011 10:54:32 PM 866 Views
I'll go with the Steeelers... - 06/02/2011 11:04:10 PM 565 Views
At least they're not the Packers. - 06/02/2011 11:32:18 PM 659 Views
Ill go with the Packers (not as many accused rapists on that team) *NM* - 06/02/2011 11:31:43 PM 326 Views
Guilty once accused? - 06/02/2011 11:59:01 PM 679 Views
Packers! - 06/02/2011 11:57:53 PM 617 Views
Bleah, but OK. - 07/02/2011 12:02:01 AM 701 Views
And the Packer pick off! - 07/02/2011 12:08:27 AM 623 Views
Re: Bleah, but OK. - 07/02/2011 10:29:35 PM 648 Views
He did get pushed into Roethlisberger at a very inopportune time. - 08/02/2011 01:31:27 PM 873 Views
Re: He did get pushed into Roethlisberger at a very inopportune time. - 09/02/2011 12:16:22 AM 733 Views
Obviously I pick the Pack... - 07/02/2011 01:04:18 AM 668 Views
The good news is Roethlisberger's a mediocre QB. - 07/02/2011 02:23:45 AM 664 Views
"Oh, we can't throw deep on 2nd and short because we might loose the ball". - 07/02/2011 02:32:43 AM 728 Views
Better keep replying. - 07/02/2011 02:38:15 AM 553 Views
Seriously? - 07/02/2011 03:20:44 AM 710 Views
Thanks! - 07/02/2011 03:31:29 AM 620 Views
NP - 07/02/2011 04:11:40 AM 693 Views
Pack won by 6. - 07/02/2011 04:21:06 AM 604 Views
Right, I keep forgetting the last FG, sorry. - 07/02/2011 06:19:50 AM 659 Views
The offense scored 24 points against the best points defense in the NFL. - 07/02/2011 08:54:37 AM 689 Views
On a very short field all but one of the times they got into the end zone. - 07/02/2011 09:43:57 AM 682 Views
joel -- give it up - 07/02/2011 01:35:11 PM 640 Views
I didn't say they didn't win fair and square. - 07/02/2011 03:36:22 PM 642 Views
The Steelers lost because they couldn't move the ball on their last drive - 08/02/2011 01:58:28 PM 814 Views
I'm aware; I'm just not sure why that makes Aaron Rodgers the Most Valuable Player. - 08/02/2011 02:04:41 PM 667 Views
because he is the QB - 08/02/2011 03:23:23 PM 673 Views
So what? - 08/02/2011 03:39:15 PM 749 Views
didn't you call Romo a choker because he hasn't won the big games? - 08/02/2011 04:24:04 PM 753 Views
Because he's LOST big games as a direct result of things he actually DID. - 08/02/2011 04:56:00 PM 711 Views
and - 08/02/2011 05:17:49 PM 793 Views
i think joel's problem is less the west coast offense and more his disdain for all things packers - 07/02/2011 01:33:10 PM 628 Views
There's enough hatred in my heart for both the Packers and the WCO. - 07/02/2011 03:42:51 PM 723 Views
What Denver cheated talk? - 07/02/2011 07:44:39 PM 873 Views
My persoanl preiction was the mirror opposite of the actual result. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:31:08 AM 277 Views
I hate when that happens. - 07/02/2011 03:55:35 AM 649 Views
gghrhahrhghg! - 07/02/2011 04:08:17 AM 685 Views
For once we agree completely. - 07/02/2011 04:17:50 AM 878 Views
Actually we just beat the second coming... - 07/02/2011 04:23:46 AM 660 Views
I loathe both teams and their fans; I find Packers fans far more insufferably arrogant. - 07/02/2011 06:28:22 AM 695 Views
Super Bowls, Super Bowls, Super Bowls. - 07/02/2011 08:42:39 AM 717 Views
Pittsburgh isn't a large market? That matters since the Pack instituted drafts and profit sharing? - 07/02/2011 09:34:03 AM 699 Views
Quite true. We are significantly better than sliced bread. - 07/02/2011 07:34:57 PM 615 Views
I know which I prefer. - 08/02/2011 03:14:11 PM 724 Views
actually.... - 09/02/2011 01:37:54 AM 572 Views
oh, you're a cowboys fan again? - 07/02/2011 01:42:58 PM 661 Views
I never stopped being a Cowboys fan. - 07/02/2011 03:53:03 PM 683 Views
I was going for Steelers. - 07/02/2011 05:53:38 AM 567 Views
Aw, Pitt doesn't seem so bad... - 07/02/2011 06:29:09 AM 695 Views
I was going for Steelers. - 07/02/2011 05:53:38 AM 656 Views
Emphatically, it seems. - 07/02/2011 09:46:18 AM 631 Views
Re: Super Bowl XLV Pick 'Em: Pittsburgh Steelers vs. Green Bay Packers - 07/02/2011 12:08:10 PM 583 Views
Yick. - 08/02/2011 01:32:31 PM 568 Views
It's awesome because it's MST3K - 08/02/2011 05:01:17 PM 655 Views
HAHAHAHA!! - 09/02/2011 01:40:16 AM 734 Views
i'm gonna go out on another limb and pick the packers to win the super bowl! - 07/02/2011 01:32:32 PM 652 Views
Yeah, I kinda figured that went without saying. - 08/02/2011 01:39:17 PM 741 Views
Great game. - 07/02/2011 02:49:22 PM 554 Views
It was exciting, but I'm more inclined to agree with Palatine about the quality. - 08/02/2011 01:46:47 PM 760 Views
Re: It was exciting, but I'm more inclined to agree with Palatine about the quality. - 08/02/2011 02:32:53 PM 713 Views
Slo mo counts on replays; that's the point. - 08/02/2011 03:24:23 PM 639 Views
despise everything they represent??? - 09/02/2011 01:54:07 AM 757 Views
Re: Slo mo counts on replays; that's the point. - 09/02/2011 02:48:55 PM 971 Views
I don't pick teams, I root for teams. - 07/02/2011 06:06:50 PM 510 Views

Reply to Message