John B. VanLoon (is that seriously his name? Amazing!).
It could be either Dutch or Belgium. Since the spelling has no space between Van and Loon I'd say Belgium, but since Loon starts with a captial L I would say Dutch.
So it is confusing, but a name none the less

Oh, as for the rest of this post, though it may be a bad taste of Evan to prduce such a viddy, as well as stupid, ignorant and provocative at worst, 20 years is a ridiculous demand...
musician jailed over youtube prank -- faces 20+years plus child porn charges
- 20/02/2011 07:55:33 AM
1170 Views
Mmmm, there is more to it . At first I was thinking it was much ado about nothing.
- 20/02/2011 03:31:51 PM
949 Views
This explains what happened better and lets me feel a little mercy for the guy.
- 20/02/2011 03:59:41 PM
1022 Views
as stated, the children were never exposed to the "adult only" performance
- 20/02/2011 04:35:32 PM
723 Views
So I guess the moral of this story is think before you put things on the internet. *NM*
- 20/02/2011 06:10:32 PM
276 Views
His only mistake was not getting them to sign something, allowing to be posted on youtube
- 21/02/2011 01:51:30 AM
703 Views
kids don't have that right. The parents would have needed to sign. *NM*
- 21/02/2011 07:24:04 PM
299 Views
The lyrics were hilarious? The sample I read and posted had nothing funny in them...maybe you can
- 22/02/2011 12:35:05 AM
605 Views
Well ... from this parents perspective
- 21/02/2011 12:33:25 PM
700 Views
For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages.
- 21/02/2011 01:50:19 PM
736 Views
Re: For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages.
- 21/02/2011 03:46:48 PM
714 Views
Tashmere's first reply above has a sample of the lyrics and how they were cut with the video. *NM*
- 21/02/2011 03:58:35 PM
266 Views
Agreed, that's really the only thing I can see that he can be sued for here. *NM*
- 25/02/2011 10:36:53 PM
252 Views
"Oh, I didn't actually abuse any of those kids."
- 21/02/2011 02:37:00 PM
642 Views
Agreed. But being an asshat is not a crime. *NM*
- 21/02/2011 05:02:59 PM
258 Views
no but using children to create sexually explicit material is
- 21/02/2011 07:36:32 PM
730 Views
Yes, this was disgusting, but since when does dirty lyrics = porn?
- 22/02/2011 04:18:05 PM
701 Views
The written word can be considered porn so why not song lyrics?
- 22/02/2011 05:04:37 PM
645 Views
It can?
- 23/02/2011 04:34:40 AM
715 Views
Yep
- 23/02/2011 05:04:49 AM
695 Views
Actually, obscenity is one of the most poorly defined concepts in US law.
- 26/02/2011 09:57:21 PM
784 Views
Am I the only one thinking of The Exorcist here?
- 25/02/2011 10:40:58 PM
772 Views
yes you are the only one thinking that
*NM*
- 25/02/2011 11:33:53 PM
245 Views
*NM*
- 25/02/2011 11:33:53 PM
245 Views
You gotta admit it doesn't get much worse than that in terms of exposing children to obscenity.
- 26/02/2011 12:13:46 AM
639 Views
Yes that is a name
- 21/02/2011 09:04:19 PM
796 Views
- 21/02/2011 09:04:19 PM
796 Views
Not sure if anyone else has asked this...
- 25/02/2011 01:19:08 PM
959 Views
kids are video taped all the time at schools
- 25/02/2011 02:05:38 PM
590 Views
School staff is one thing, outside sources are another.
- 25/02/2011 02:56:20 PM
672 Views
most states run background checks and this guy may have had one run on him
- 25/02/2011 03:19:58 PM
673 Views
he got permission from the teacher and the kids' parents before the original filming session
- 25/02/2011 03:20:30 PM
676 Views
they probably didn't think he would it to make a "funny" video
- 26/02/2011 07:43:59 PM
783 Views
show one example the song was about sex with children and I might agree *NM*
- 26/02/2011 09:23:44 PM
294 Views
If you try hard enough you can believe whatever you want
- 26/02/2011 10:09:45 PM
691 Views
and if you're determined to railroad someone none of the facts matter
- 26/02/2011 11:36:42 PM
834 Views
If I put out a video that had you giggling as I sung about cumming on your face you would be fine?
- 27/02/2011 09:09:25 PM
617 Views
of course not, but the 1st amendment says you have the right
- 27/02/2011 11:02:42 PM
584 Views
the courts ruled a long time ago that the 1st amendment does not cover all speech
- 28/02/2011 10:58:38 PM
806 Views

*NM*