Active Users:1063 Time:02/11/2025 07:08:16 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
If I put out a video that had you giggling as I sung about cumming on your face you would be fine? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 27/02/2011 09:09:25 PM
I how about your mom would it be a problem for you then since I didn't actaully sing it to you or her after all. If it was your daughter would you feel she had been violated? Would you consider it sexual? If so then we are back to him making a sexual video where he depicts children laughing and he sangs about violating them. Why you need to defend that is beyond me. I have said twenty years is excessive repeatedly but this goes way beyond a prank and he needs to be punished and it should include time in jail. He also needs to never be allowed to work with young children again since he has proven he lacks the judgment to handle the responsibility. Actions have consequences.
Reply to message
musician jailed over youtube prank -- faces 20+years plus child porn charges moondog - 20/02/2011 07:55:33 AM 1172 Views
Yay for home! MrFarstrider - 20/02/2011 12:20:14 PM 723 Views
Re: Yay for home! everynametaken - 22/02/2011 05:05:49 AM 712 Views
Mmmm, there is more to it . At first I was thinking it was much ado about nothing. Tashmere - 20/02/2011 03:31:51 PM 950 Views
This explains what happened better and lets me feel a little mercy for the guy. Tashmere - 20/02/2011 03:59:41 PM 1022 Views
as stated, the children were never exposed to the "adult only" performance moondog - 20/02/2011 04:35:32 PM 725 Views
So I guess the moral of this story is think before you put things on the internet. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/02/2011 06:10:32 PM 276 Views
He should get the pants sued off him. Ghavrel - 20/02/2011 07:08:56 PM 624 Views
His only mistake was not getting them to sign something, allowing to be posted on youtube A Deathwatch Guard - 21/02/2011 01:51:30 AM 705 Views
kids don't have that right. The parents would have needed to sign. *NM* random thoughts - 21/02/2011 07:24:04 PM 299 Views
The lyrics were hilarious? The sample I read and posted had nothing funny in them...maybe you can Tashmere - 22/02/2011 12:35:05 AM 605 Views
Well ... from this parents perspective dart_board - 21/02/2011 12:33:25 PM 701 Views
Lol and people say human beings aren't civilized *NM* Dark Knight - 21/02/2011 05:32:32 PM 282 Views
Re: Lol and people say human beings aren't civilized dart_board - 22/02/2011 02:19:48 PM 636 Views
Stupid and in bad taste, but certainly not worth jail time *NM* ironclad - 21/02/2011 12:41:28 PM 291 Views
For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages. Tom - 21/02/2011 01:50:19 PM 737 Views
Re: For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages. moondog - 21/02/2011 03:46:48 PM 716 Views
Tashmere's first reply above has a sample of the lyrics and how they were cut with the video. *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 21/02/2011 03:58:35 PM 266 Views
Agreed, that's really the only thing I can see that he can be sued for here. *NM* Legolas - 25/02/2011 10:36:53 PM 252 Views
"Oh, I didn't actually abuse any of those kids." Sareitha Sedai - 21/02/2011 02:37:00 PM 643 Views
Agreed. But being an asshat is not a crime. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/02/2011 05:02:59 PM 258 Views
No, it's not. Sareitha Sedai - 21/02/2011 05:22:05 PM 724 Views
no but using children to create sexually explicit material is random thoughts - 21/02/2011 07:36:32 PM 730 Views
"sexually explicit material" is different than "obscene" moondog - 22/02/2011 02:43:49 AM 662 Views
That is debatable. Tashmere - 22/02/2011 05:25:46 AM 637 Views
you don't believe both can describe language? random thoughts - 22/02/2011 02:30:16 PM 598 Views
Yes, this was disgusting, but since when does dirty lyrics = porn? Aeryn - 22/02/2011 04:18:05 PM 702 Views
The written word can be considered porn so why not song lyrics? random thoughts - 22/02/2011 05:04:37 PM 646 Views
It can? Aeryn - 23/02/2011 04:34:40 AM 716 Views
Yep Isaac - 23/02/2011 05:04:49 AM 696 Views
Actually, obscenity is one of the most poorly defined concepts in US law. Ghavrel - 26/02/2011 09:57:21 PM 785 Views
Yes, I've posted on the Miller Test Isaac - 26/02/2011 10:54:11 PM 838 Views
Penthouse letters is porn random thoughts - 24/02/2011 12:52:31 AM 633 Views
Am I the only one thinking of The Exorcist here? Legolas - 25/02/2011 10:40:58 PM 774 Views
yes you are the only one thinking that *NM* random thoughts - 25/02/2011 11:33:53 PM 245 Views
You gotta admit it doesn't get much worse than that in terms of exposing children to obscenity. Legolas - 26/02/2011 12:13:46 AM 640 Views
I need say I don't think he should go to prison for twenty years random thoughts - 26/02/2011 07:30:17 PM 676 Views
Yes that is a name Bramhodoulos - 21/02/2011 09:04:19 PM 796 Views
Inappropriate of course but child porn? Give me a break! *NM* everynametaken - 22/02/2011 05:06:20 AM 318 Views
defamation maybe Aeryn - 22/02/2011 04:21:03 PM 587 Views
Not sure if anyone else has asked this... Antigone - 25/02/2011 01:19:08 PM 959 Views
kids are video taped all the time at schools random thoughts - 25/02/2011 02:05:38 PM 592 Views
School staff is one thing, outside sources are another. Avendesora - 25/02/2011 02:56:20 PM 673 Views
most states run background checks and this guy may have had one run on him random thoughts - 25/02/2011 03:19:58 PM 675 Views
he got permission from the teacher and the kids' parents before the original filming session moondog - 25/02/2011 03:20:30 PM 678 Views
they probably didn't think he would it to make a "funny" video random thoughts - 26/02/2011 07:43:59 PM 784 Views
show one example the song was about sex with children and I might agree *NM* moondog - 26/02/2011 09:23:44 PM 294 Views
If you try hard enough you can believe whatever you want random thoughts - 26/02/2011 10:09:45 PM 693 Views
and if you're determined to railroad someone none of the facts matter moondog - 26/02/2011 11:36:42 PM 835 Views
If I put out a video that had you giggling as I sung about cumming on your face you would be fine? random thoughts - 27/02/2011 09:09:25 PM 619 Views
of course not, but the 1st amendment says you have the right moondog - 27/02/2011 11:02:42 PM 585 Views
the courts ruled a long time ago that the 1st amendment does not cover all speech random thoughts - 28/02/2011 10:58:38 PM 808 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes