Acknowledged (though I'd not seen that response yet, sorry).
Joel Send a noteboard - 17/03/2011 12:11:58 AM
I'm not gonna exchange parting shots or try to score one last hit or something, I don't like this thread, I don't like any of the ones we've had recently, and right now I don't want to discuss any of this shit anymore, because its just round and fucking round and I don't care if you agree with my points or anything else, I just don't want to do this crap anymore.
OK.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 17/03/2011 at 12:13:01 AM
So, how many drugs is Rush Limbaugh actually on?
16/03/2011 08:30:25 AM
- 946 Views
Possibly different ones then the EESC president
16/03/2011 03:58:41 PM
- 871 Views
No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
16/03/2011 04:22:52 PM
- 656 Views
Tsunami and climate change
17/03/2011 11:59:36 PM
- 869 Views
"Speakers were careful to point out that many findings still amounted only to hypotheses"
18/03/2011 01:31:44 PM
- 801 Views
Re: No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
18/03/2011 12:25:01 PM
- 826 Views
Republican spin doctor Frank Luntz popularized "climate change" to make global warming appealing.
18/03/2011 01:56:01 PM
- 737 Views
A slightly misleading post
16/03/2011 07:41:46 PM
- 752 Views
Kind of missed the point there
16/03/2011 09:54:35 PM
- 755 Views
If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
16/03/2011 10:16:21 PM
- 627 Views
Re: If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
16/03/2011 10:44:56 PM
- 759 Views
" I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
16/03/2011 11:10:11 PM
- 772 Views
Re: " I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
16/03/2011 11:42:29 PM
- 600 Views
I've read the transcript
16/03/2011 10:34:41 PM
- 772 Views
Re: I've read the transcript
16/03/2011 10:46:42 PM
- 678 Views
You need to reread what I said
16/03/2011 10:49:45 PM
- 647 Views
No, I think you're still missing my point
16/03/2011 11:09:04 PM
- 721 Views
No. You don't get to say, "what he said doesn't matter because of how we learned of it".
16/03/2011 11:54:46 PM
- 697 Views
I told you, I'm done in this thread
16/03/2011 11:59:08 PM
- 636 Views
Acknowledged (though I'd not seen that response yet, sorry).
17/03/2011 12:11:58 AM
- 693 Views
I think Republicans should stop using "legitimate". I do not think it means what they think it means
16/03/2011 04:11:14 PM
- 781 Views
there are enough carzies on the left to make things like this easy for Rush
16/03/2011 04:20:47 PM
- 718 Views
So it doesn't matter that no one said it as long as he can plausibly claim they did.
16/03/2011 06:58:17 PM
- 640 Views
well since it is taken out of context it is hard to say where Rush was going with it
16/03/2011 07:19:46 PM
- 737 Views
Um... he stated where he was going with it.
16/03/2011 07:30:02 PM
- 709 Views
At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard
16/03/2011 08:17:39 PM
- 649 Views
It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe.
16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM
- 772 Views
I don't thinkit is as clear as you make it out to be
16/03/2011 09:31:53 PM
- 671 Views
It is not just "possible" he's talking about islands affected by global warming; he says it outright
16/03/2011 10:09:16 PM
- 837 Views
Sorry but I still fail to see how the islands he mention are a sign of what needs to be done
16/03/2011 10:27:20 PM
- 706 Views
Then you don't understand context and this whole discussion is pointless.
16/03/2011 11:28:47 PM
- 781 Views
lets throw a little context at asnd see if it matters
17/03/2011 12:12:03 AM
- 672 Views
Yes: It makes it worse.
17/03/2011 12:45:12 AM
- 672 Views
no it shows that the one statements was not meant to be taken literally
17/03/2011 02:47:55 AM
- 698 Views
At best, it shows he was joking about something he believes to be fact despite lacking evidence.
18/03/2011 02:24:45 PM
- 778 Views
so you finally agre that the context changes the meaning, took you long enough
18/03/2011 02:33:41 PM
- 649 Views