Acknowledged (though I'd not seen that response yet, sorry).
Joel Send a noteboard - 17/03/2011 12:11:58 AM
I'm not gonna exchange parting shots or try to score one last hit or something, I don't like this thread, I don't like any of the ones we've had recently, and right now I don't want to discuss any of this shit anymore, because its just round and fucking round and I don't care if you agree with my points or anything else, I just don't want to do this crap anymore.
OK.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 17/03/2011 at 12:13:01 AM
So, how many drugs is Rush Limbaugh actually on?
- 16/03/2011 08:30:25 AM
997 Views
Possibly different ones then the EESC president
- 16/03/2011 03:58:41 PM
957 Views
No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
- 16/03/2011 04:22:52 PM
708 Views
Tsunami and climate change
- 17/03/2011 11:59:36 PM
951 Views
"Speakers were careful to point out that many findings still amounted only to hypotheses"
- 18/03/2011 01:31:44 PM
856 Views
Re: No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
- 18/03/2011 12:25:01 PM
892 Views
Republican spin doctor Frank Luntz popularized "climate change" to make global warming appealing.
- 18/03/2011 01:56:01 PM
795 Views
A slightly misleading post
- 16/03/2011 07:41:46 PM
810 Views
Kind of missed the point there
- 16/03/2011 09:54:35 PM
813 Views
If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
- 16/03/2011 10:16:21 PM
683 Views
Re: If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
- 16/03/2011 10:44:56 PM
813 Views
" I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
- 16/03/2011 11:10:11 PM
827 Views
Re: " I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
- 16/03/2011 11:42:29 PM
657 Views
I've read the transcript
- 16/03/2011 10:34:41 PM
831 Views
Re: I've read the transcript
- 16/03/2011 10:46:42 PM
732 Views
You need to reread what I said
- 16/03/2011 10:49:45 PM
700 Views
No, I think you're still missing my point
- 16/03/2011 11:09:04 PM
777 Views
No. You don't get to say, "what he said doesn't matter because of how we learned of it".
- 16/03/2011 11:54:46 PM
760 Views
I told you, I'm done in this thread
- 16/03/2011 11:59:08 PM
692 Views
Acknowledged (though I'd not seen that response yet, sorry).
- 17/03/2011 12:11:58 AM
748 Views
I think Republicans should stop using "legitimate". I do not think it means what they think it means
- 16/03/2011 04:11:14 PM
870 Views
there are enough carzies on the left to make things like this easy for Rush
- 16/03/2011 04:20:47 PM
776 Views
So it doesn't matter that no one said it as long as he can plausibly claim they did.
- 16/03/2011 06:58:17 PM
700 Views
well since it is taken out of context it is hard to say where Rush was going with it
- 16/03/2011 07:19:46 PM
787 Views
Um... he stated where he was going with it.
- 16/03/2011 07:30:02 PM
760 Views
At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard
- 16/03/2011 08:17:39 PM
712 Views
It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe.
- 16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM
824 Views
I don't thinkit is as clear as you make it out to be
- 16/03/2011 09:31:53 PM
726 Views
It is not just "possible" he's talking about islands affected by global warming; he says it outright
- 16/03/2011 10:09:16 PM
897 Views
Sorry but I still fail to see how the islands he mention are a sign of what needs to be done
- 16/03/2011 10:27:20 PM
764 Views
Then you don't understand context and this whole discussion is pointless.
- 16/03/2011 11:28:47 PM
838 Views
lets throw a little context at asnd see if it matters
- 17/03/2011 12:12:03 AM
732 Views
Yes: It makes it worse.
- 17/03/2011 12:45:12 AM
724 Views
no it shows that the one statements was not meant to be taken literally
- 17/03/2011 02:47:55 AM
754 Views
At best, it shows he was joking about something he believes to be fact despite lacking evidence.
- 18/03/2011 02:24:45 PM
829 Views
so you finally agre that the context changes the meaning, took you long enough
- 18/03/2011 02:33:41 PM
707 Views

