Active Users:3795 Time:14/09/2026 01:28:07 AM
For a lot of people it is. Legolas Send a noteboard - 26/03/2011 04:52:57 PM
"Thomas" is a proper name derived from the Gospels and it has a meaning. "Tom" is just a short form of Thomas. In my personal experience, I use the name "Tom" more because having a first name ending in -s clashes with my last name. On business cards, however, I have my full name (with middle initial), and many people call me by my full name (my mother positively hates "Tom" though she did call me "Tommy" when I was little).

Ah, I didn't know some people used your full name.

In any case, lots of people nowadays have names without meanings, or with meanings they don't even know about. And even when they do know them, the meaning often isn't much of a factor in choosing the name, except perhaps to reject certain names. So I don't see anything wrong with naming a son simply "Tom" - I know plenty of people with that name, and that name alone.
It's a nice level of flexibility and I like the increased flexibility that Slavic languages have. I've been Tomik and Tomasik to Russian friends and cannot tell you how many permutations on names I've used for Russian friends' names.

Yeah, I saw a bit of that during my aforementioned stay in Poland, the different permutations. It is kind of neat.
Reply to message
Which apostles of Jesus Christ have you known? In the biblical sense, of course. - 23/03/2011 04:52:48 AM 1829 Views
About as close as I can get it is a Mary *NM* - 23/03/2011 04:55:10 AM 386 Views
Yeah... Inequality and discrimination is so annoying! - 23/03/2011 05:10:48 AM 878 Views
most of them don't even have decent female versions to use *NM* - 23/03/2011 01:10:15 PM 406 Views
Slutty. I like it *NM* - 23/03/2011 05:10:03 AM 438 Views
lol, how many apostles do you think is slutty? *NM* - 23/03/2011 05:11:37 AM 502 Views
Depends. How many you been with? *NM* - 23/03/2011 05:12:28 AM 506 Views
My answer. - 23/03/2011 05:14:54 AM 1106 Views
Oh prude! 12 would have been a much sexier answer *NM* - 23/03/2011 05:19:45 AM 1412 Views
Where is the line between prude and slut? *NM* - 23/03/2011 05:34:57 AM 512 Views
Sorry, trade secret. *NM* - 23/03/2011 05:37:46 AM 504 Views
Darn! - 23/03/2011 05:44:33 AM 1073 Views
My challenge to you... - 23/03/2011 06:39:06 AM 970 Views
You don't get to give me challenges. - 23/03/2011 03:09:10 PM 919 Views
Of course I do - 23/03/2011 08:34:29 PM 855 Views
I think it's related to statistical significance. *NM* - 23/03/2011 10:55:26 AM 476 Views
Also, 12 would mean that there was a Judas. - 23/03/2011 05:56:59 AM 847 Views
oh man, i gotta remember dude's names? - 23/03/2011 05:44:06 AM 1088 Views
What do you mean, "maybe"? - 23/03/2011 05:46:54 AM 1076 Views
Yeah, you're winning so far. *NM* - 23/03/2011 10:54:16 AM 500 Views
You know, Joshua and Jesus are the same name. - 23/03/2011 06:54:52 AM 935 Views
Good point. Joshua/Josh counts. *NM* - 23/03/2011 03:55:11 PM 515 Views
How can they have English names, when English didn't even exist yet!?! *NM* - 23/03/2011 08:56:09 AM 516 Views
God must be a forward thinker. *NM* - 23/03/2011 09:34:07 AM 399 Views
Different ethnic versions of the names are fine. *NM* - 23/03/2011 03:12:18 PM 496 Views
Joshua = Jesus. According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal - 24/03/2011 10:08:27 PM 879 Views
Because cleary, God is a Brit. - 24/03/2011 12:40:28 PM 913 Views
My response. - 23/03/2011 10:53:06 AM 1015 Views
1.5 - 23/03/2011 02:43:46 PM 1001 Views
Why? - 23/03/2011 03:15:23 PM 933 Views
lol, I'm sorry, that just got a lot funnier than I had expected it to. - 23/03/2011 03:25:38 PM 1096 Views
Then it doesn't count. - 23/03/2011 03:53:55 PM 1001 Views
Have a John is better than none...? *MN* - 27/03/2011 03:42:09 AM 876 Views
Half a John, hahaha. Classic *NM* - 23/03/2011 03:55:37 PM 491 Views
*NM* - 24/03/2011 01:34:40 AM 443 Views
*NM* - 24/03/2011 12:00:03 PM 495 Views
In a strictly Biblical sense, it's the men who do the "knowing" and women who are "known". *NM* - 23/03/2011 10:20:34 PM 466 Views
"How many apostles have known you?" Fantastic. *NM* - 23/03/2011 11:05:25 PM 501 Views
LOL. *NM* - 24/03/2011 04:12:21 AM 499 Views
Also, John and Jonathan are not the same name. - 24/03/2011 02:48:49 AM 836 Views
Well Tom, if you've *been known* by both a John and a Jonathan, my hat's off to you. - 24/03/2011 04:11:49 AM 863 Views
I have come into the world, but the world has known me not. - 24/03/2011 01:43:36 PM 965 Views
Nice *NM* - 25/03/2011 10:19:37 PM 488 Views
Which is why "Johnathan", "Jonathon" and the like are such abominable names. *NM* - 25/03/2011 07:41:02 PM 487 Views
I hate it when people of the same ethnicity have different spellings of essentially the same name. *NM* - 25/03/2011 10:20:32 PM 514 Views
Алина, Алена, Елена really bothers me - 25/03/2011 11:42:56 PM 952 Views
Americans still have that "official name vs. everyday-use name" thing to a very large degree. - 26/03/2011 12:08:26 AM 1059 Views
Germans do it. - 26/03/2011 12:20:21 AM 879 Views
I think you'll find they do it rather less these days. - 26/03/2011 12:31:54 AM 1004 Views
I think you may be misunderstanding the concept of nicknames. - 26/03/2011 04:17:09 PM 872 Views
I have known people who did it - 29/03/2011 05:41:32 PM 803 Views
Actually, all Slavic languages do it extensively. - 26/03/2011 12:29:39 AM 926 Views
My experience with Slavic languages is extremely limited, but... - 26/03/2011 12:44:19 AM 812 Views
But "Tom" isn't a proper name. - 26/03/2011 01:53:38 PM 910 Views
For a lot of people it is. - 26/03/2011 04:52:57 PM 1038 Views
Hoi polloi do a lot of idiotic things. - 26/03/2011 04:58:46 PM 983 Views
Oh that's not that bad! - 26/03/2011 03:48:05 PM 938 Views
Well, you're in luck! - 26/03/2011 04:52:18 PM 863 Views
But I can't! - 26/03/2011 05:13:20 PM 809 Views
Sure you can - 26/03/2011 05:56:10 PM 873 Views
But... - 28/03/2011 07:28:17 PM 976 Views
But "Anya" only has a meaning as a short form of Anna. - 29/03/2011 05:29:33 PM 797 Views
None - 24/03/2011 03:15:50 AM 861 Views
Awww. - 24/03/2011 04:30:09 AM 1042 Views
I guess I haven't gone the apostle route - 24/03/2011 01:48:48 PM 919 Views
Re: I guess I haven't gone the apostle route - 24/03/2011 09:59:17 PM 867 Views
Are there more Peters, or are Peters more likely to get laid? *NM* - 25/03/2011 06:08:51 AM 501 Views
Re: Are there more Peters, or are Peters more likely to get laid? - 25/03/2011 11:10:47 AM 947 Views
I had no idea! - 26/03/2011 04:28:06 PM 972 Views
It's never too late! *NM* - 25/03/2011 06:42:01 PM 486 Views
Ah, I'm probably going to be known by only one man for the rest of my life - 26/03/2011 04:27:41 PM 908 Views
Well then maybe it is too late *NM* - 26/03/2011 05:25:46 PM 441 Views
Yeah, most likely :-) it's actually quite nice to be honest. *NM* - 26/03/2011 05:52:37 PM 510 Views
Best I can do - 28/03/2011 07:01:17 AM 992 Views
That's awesome. - 28/03/2011 07:25:46 PM 1024 Views

Reply to Message