Active Users:669 Time:18/03/2026 04:51:46 AM
One little correction Isaac Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM
Kinetic Energy isn't a conserved quantity, energy is (barring time zero of course) and so is momentum, but not kinetic energy. Entropy is a non-conserved quantity too, barring time zero again. Though in any steady-state model entropy over an infinite period of time does go down occassionaly. Again, in a steady-state, because if you take a deck of cards in an order and shuffle it, it's entropy will increase, but if you shuffle it enough times, it will return to it's orginal state. This principle leads a lot of us to believe, and God I hate this term, that the 'multi-verse' may be a steady state system. Even there though, you do end up back at the 'where the f did it originally come from' issue.

Lot's of people play with a 'temporary quantum flux' thing as the origin reason, since energy only has to be conserved over a specific ratio of time to energy and that time is governed by the fundamental constants, which might not be the same outside our 'universe', but then you still fall into the 'so where'd that other stuff come from' issue. But it might explain our universe's origins, under the 'over an infinite period of time it shall rain snickers bars' rule of quantum mechanics.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 982 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 310 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 297 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 297 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 802 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 296 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 718 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 708 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 750 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 765 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 287 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 680 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 718 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 319 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 297 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 297 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 302 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 298 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 310 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 300 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 624 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 275 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 297 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 283 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 694 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 681 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 707 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 753 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 670 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 652 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 707 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 276 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 270 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 925 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 627 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 830 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 808 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 653 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 765 Views

Reply to Message