Active Users:655 Time:03/08/2025 10:34:15 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that. Tom Send a noteboard - 14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM
I'm not sure what spreadsheet you were looking at but those numbers are so far out of the ballpark as to be prima facie suspect.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
How can anyone seriously support Obama's budget proposals? Tom - 14/04/2011 02:49:30 PM 1187 Views
I agree with your overall point but I do question one of your facts random thoughts - 14/04/2011 03:25:25 PM 670 Views
Using IRS data for 2008: (most recent year for which data is available) Macharius - 14/04/2011 03:45:20 PM 696 Views
those numbers sem high. What is your source? *NM* random thoughts - 14/04/2011 05:05:26 PM 261 Views
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that. Tom - 14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM 558 Views
I'm gonna have to jump on board the wagon with that being a bad figure, got some others Isaac - 14/04/2011 07:33:14 PM 740 Views
Some other income data for historical perspective, again CBO Isaac - 14/04/2011 07:45:13 PM 661 Views
Data: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/08in31mt.xls *NM* Macharius - 14/04/2011 08:32:42 PM 277 Views
That's a breakdown of who modifies their returns and how it affects revenue. Tom - 14/04/2011 09:15:21 PM 515 Views
I see. Well, nevermind then. *NM* Macharius - 15/04/2011 01:37:13 PM 266 Views
I believe you are questioning one of my definitions, not one of my facts. Tom - 14/04/2011 04:36:35 PM 611 Views
No matter how you define it I think it would be hard to call the top 5% middle class random thoughts - 14/04/2011 05:03:33 PM 628 Views
A family making $150,000 is not middle class? Tom - 14/04/2011 06:07:07 PM 632 Views
reading what you said again random thoughts - 14/04/2011 06:37:54 PM 586 Views
What a load of crap! Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 03:49:29 PM 742 Views
Yes, your response is a load of crap. Tom - 14/04/2011 04:55:20 PM 678 Views
Re: Yes, your response is a load of crap. Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 05:13:14 PM 753 Views
This is our first war without a tax increase. Tom - 14/04/2011 06:05:43 PM 668 Views
"Artful Dodgers" Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 06:30:58 PM 623 Views
Not giving me the information I need Tom - 14/04/2011 09:33:36 PM 596 Views
Er, check facts Isaac - 14/04/2011 05:04:02 PM 810 Views
Yeah, lets fact check Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 05:43:34 PM 650 Views
You understand you're actually supposed to cite data for a fact check right? Isaac - 14/04/2011 06:38:22 PM 817 Views
I'm not sure thats entirely right MalkierKnight - 14/04/2011 05:51:18 PM 888 Views
You basically just said what I said. How am I not right? Tom - 14/04/2011 05:56:08 PM 620 Views
Re: You basically just said what I said. How am I not right? MalkierKnight - 15/04/2011 02:48:07 AM 793 Views
A response Roland00 - 14/04/2011 06:33:49 PM 729 Views
I only have one thing to ask. callandor1000 - 15/04/2011 02:36:07 PM 588 Views
What about the farm subsidies and the military? Vivien - 15/04/2011 04:54:54 PM 605 Views
Re: What about the farm subsidies and the military? Skeeve the Great - 15/04/2011 08:21:16 PM 597 Views
Cutting the military isn't enough Roland00 - 16/04/2011 04:27:11 AM 586 Views
Defense is 60% of the discretionary budget as well, so it's more like 26% overall. Just sayin'. *NM* Ghavrel - 16/04/2011 04:53:30 AM 280 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes