Active Users:1383 Time:02/11/2025 03:58:01 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that. Tom Send a noteboard - 14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM
I'm not sure what spreadsheet you were looking at but those numbers are so far out of the ballpark as to be prima facie suspect.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
How can anyone seriously support Obama's budget proposals? Tom - 14/04/2011 02:49:30 PM 1223 Views
I agree with your overall point but I do question one of your facts random thoughts - 14/04/2011 03:25:25 PM 689 Views
Using IRS data for 2008: (most recent year for which data is available) Macharius - 14/04/2011 03:45:20 PM 718 Views
those numbers sem high. What is your source? *NM* random thoughts - 14/04/2011 05:05:26 PM 269 Views
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that. Tom - 14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM 582 Views
I'm gonna have to jump on board the wagon with that being a bad figure, got some others Isaac - 14/04/2011 07:33:14 PM 764 Views
Some other income data for historical perspective, again CBO Isaac - 14/04/2011 07:45:13 PM 685 Views
Data: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/08in31mt.xls *NM* Macharius - 14/04/2011 08:32:42 PM 285 Views
That's a breakdown of who modifies their returns and how it affects revenue. Tom - 14/04/2011 09:15:21 PM 540 Views
I see. Well, nevermind then. *NM* Macharius - 15/04/2011 01:37:13 PM 273 Views
I believe you are questioning one of my definitions, not one of my facts. Tom - 14/04/2011 04:36:35 PM 631 Views
No matter how you define it I think it would be hard to call the top 5% middle class random thoughts - 14/04/2011 05:03:33 PM 651 Views
A family making $150,000 is not middle class? Tom - 14/04/2011 06:07:07 PM 652 Views
reading what you said again random thoughts - 14/04/2011 06:37:54 PM 606 Views
What a load of crap! Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 03:49:29 PM 765 Views
Yes, your response is a load of crap. Tom - 14/04/2011 04:55:20 PM 714 Views
Re: Yes, your response is a load of crap. Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 05:13:14 PM 777 Views
This is our first war without a tax increase. Tom - 14/04/2011 06:05:43 PM 690 Views
"Artful Dodgers" Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 06:30:58 PM 644 Views
Not giving me the information I need Tom - 14/04/2011 09:33:36 PM 617 Views
Er, check facts Isaac - 14/04/2011 05:04:02 PM 835 Views
Yeah, lets fact check Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 05:43:34 PM 691 Views
You understand you're actually supposed to cite data for a fact check right? Isaac - 14/04/2011 06:38:22 PM 844 Views
I'm not sure thats entirely right MalkierKnight - 14/04/2011 05:51:18 PM 935 Views
You basically just said what I said. How am I not right? Tom - 14/04/2011 05:56:08 PM 643 Views
Re: You basically just said what I said. How am I not right? MalkierKnight - 15/04/2011 02:48:07 AM 814 Views
A response Roland00 - 14/04/2011 06:33:49 PM 756 Views
I only have one thing to ask. callandor1000 - 15/04/2011 02:36:07 PM 609 Views
What about the farm subsidies and the military? Vivien - 15/04/2011 04:54:54 PM 628 Views
Re: What about the farm subsidies and the military? Skeeve the Great - 15/04/2011 08:21:16 PM 618 Views
Cutting the military isn't enough Roland00 - 16/04/2011 04:27:11 AM 609 Views
Defense is 60% of the discretionary budget as well, so it's more like 26% overall. Just sayin'. *NM* Ghavrel - 16/04/2011 04:53:30 AM 290 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes