Active Users:478 Time:18/06/2025 08:42:56 AM
sure this example is about convicted robbers Aisha Send a noteboard - 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM
But I have a problem with this tactic being used against muslims who have the unfortunate luck of knowing someone the government doesnt like. And there was a case where the son of a cleric the US doesnt like who was being tracked with a gps under his car that he pulled out when he saw it. And sure you can say well they have to watch him cuz you never know who is and isnt a terrorist but that goes for everyone then. We should all be required to have gps on our cars and even our bodies because who knows, maybe i could rob a persons house tomorrow and you could be planning a rape. and My neighbor could be planning on burning down a mosque/church/synagogue.

Cops have followed suspects for years and that is considered legal. This is just a more high tech way of doing it. Sorry but your car on a public road is not someplace you should have an expectation of privacy. If it is illegal to have sex someplace you should assume you don't have privacy.

The argument that this guts the 4th amendment is pure hyperbole. There have always been very few places where you could expect priviacy. The word private is where the key here, if you are in public it isn't private.
Aisha - formerly known as randschicka
Reply to message
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice - 16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM 898 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this? - 16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM 517 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers - 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM 478 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason - 16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM 471 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society - 17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM 467 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from - 17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 481 Views
checks and balances - 17/05/2011 09:22:13 PM 519 Views
no the police can follow you around without probable cause - 17/05/2011 10:09:57 PM 475 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens - 16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM 473 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution - 16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM 527 Views
4th amendment - 17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM 516 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM 476 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM 503 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM 475 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 17/05/2011 09:19:09 PM 478 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM 460 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM 490 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM 241 Views
Because it's surveillance when they're in public. - 17/05/2011 09:31:02 PM 518 Views
The kiddies still call it weed. *NM* - 18/05/2011 12:08:26 AM 210 Views
your example does not quite work for this situation - 18/05/2011 01:49:02 AM 496 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM* - 17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM 196 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first - 18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM 482 Views
OK I will use smaller words - 18/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 509 Views
spelling it out for you - 18/05/2011 04:18:45 PM 573 Views
I'm happy with it. *NM* - 17/05/2011 03:04:42 AM 329 Views
Molestation - 18/05/2011 04:22:19 AM 682 Views

Reply to Message