Active Users:584 Time:01/11/2026 01:07:47 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 Send a noteboard - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM

Its really no different from them just following you around. I would rather them do it more efficiently with a GPS than waste man hours and gas and what not on someone following these guys. Same principle.


you're right on the first point, it's no different than following someone around. the difference being: one time it will be you for no other reason than they have the power now.


So what? They can follow me if they want. They can track me. What are they gonna do? Make fun of me for how often I go to McDonalds and then Chipotle immediately afterwards? For realsies. Unless I'm doing something wrong and illegal, I don't care if they follow me or track me. Nothing good will come of it. I'm pretty frickin lame. Further, I'm amused just thinking about someone tracking me. It cracks me up. Hehe. They'll be pretty disappointed.

Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.

My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Reply to message
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice moondog - 16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM 1094 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this? random thoughts - 16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM 670 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers Aisha - 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM 631 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM 646 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society moondog - 17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM 633 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 644 Views
checks and balances moondog - 17/05/2011 09:22:13 PM 672 Views
no the police can follow you around without probable cause random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:09:57 PM 622 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens moondog - 16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM 640 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM 691 Views
4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM 682 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM 633 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM 657 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM 634 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 09:19:09 PM 638 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM 611 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM 643 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* moondog - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM 305 Views
Because it's surveillance when they're in public. Sareitha Sedai - 17/05/2011 09:31:02 PM 676 Views
The kiddies still call it weed. *NM* Ghavrel - 18/05/2011 12:08:26 AM 273 Views
your example does not quite work for this situation moondog - 18/05/2011 01:49:02 AM 647 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM* random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM 263 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first moondog - 18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM 639 Views
OK I will use smaller words random thoughts - 18/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 671 Views
spelling it out for you moondog - 18/05/2011 04:18:45 PM 733 Views
I'm happy with it. *NM* callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:04:42 AM 404 Views
Molestation Knightscape - 18/05/2011 04:22:19 AM 859 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes