Active Users:754 Time:03/02/2026 12:17:52 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 Send a noteboard - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM

Its really no different from them just following you around. I would rather them do it more efficiently with a GPS than waste man hours and gas and what not on someone following these guys. Same principle.


you're right on the first point, it's no different than following someone around. the difference being: one time it will be you for no other reason than they have the power now.


So what? They can follow me if they want. They can track me. What are they gonna do? Make fun of me for how often I go to McDonalds and then Chipotle immediately afterwards? For realsies. Unless I'm doing something wrong and illegal, I don't care if they follow me or track me. Nothing good will come of it. I'm pretty frickin lame. Further, I'm amused just thinking about someone tracking me. It cracks me up. Hehe. They'll be pretty disappointed.

Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.

My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Reply to message
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice moondog - 16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM 975 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this? random thoughts - 16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM 564 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers Aisha - 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM 529 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM 540 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society moondog - 17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM 525 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 536 Views
checks and balances moondog - 17/05/2011 09:22:13 PM 573 Views
no the police can follow you around without probable cause random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:09:57 PM 528 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens moondog - 16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM 530 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM 582 Views
4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM 569 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM 529 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM 556 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM 531 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 09:19:09 PM 536 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM 508 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM 541 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* moondog - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM 264 Views
Because it's surveillance when they're in public. Sareitha Sedai - 17/05/2011 09:31:02 PM 572 Views
The kiddies still call it weed. *NM* Ghavrel - 18/05/2011 12:08:26 AM 229 Views
your example does not quite work for this situation moondog - 18/05/2011 01:49:02 AM 546 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM* random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM 219 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first moondog - 18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM 539 Views
OK I will use smaller words random thoughts - 18/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 566 Views
spelling it out for you moondog - 18/05/2011 04:18:45 PM 627 Views
I'm happy with it. *NM* callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:04:42 AM 356 Views
Molestation Knightscape - 18/05/2011 04:22:19 AM 751 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes