Active Users:885 Time:21/03/2026 03:38:36 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 Send a noteboard - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM

Its really no different from them just following you around. I would rather them do it more efficiently with a GPS than waste man hours and gas and what not on someone following these guys. Same principle.


you're right on the first point, it's no different than following someone around. the difference being: one time it will be you for no other reason than they have the power now.


So what? They can follow me if they want. They can track me. What are they gonna do? Make fun of me for how often I go to McDonalds and then Chipotle immediately afterwards? For realsies. Unless I'm doing something wrong and illegal, I don't care if they follow me or track me. Nothing good will come of it. I'm pretty frickin lame. Further, I'm amused just thinking about someone tracking me. It cracks me up. Hehe. They'll be pretty disappointed.

Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.

My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Reply to message
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice moondog - 16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM 991 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this? random thoughts - 16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM 572 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers Aisha - 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM 539 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM 549 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society moondog - 17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM 535 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 548 Views
checks and balances moondog - 17/05/2011 09:22:13 PM 586 Views
no the police can follow you around without probable cause random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:09:57 PM 536 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens moondog - 16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM 539 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM 594 Views
4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM 578 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM 538 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM 569 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM 544 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 09:19:09 PM 548 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM 523 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM 552 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* moondog - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM 268 Views
Because it's surveillance when they're in public. Sareitha Sedai - 17/05/2011 09:31:02 PM 583 Views
The kiddies still call it weed. *NM* Ghavrel - 18/05/2011 12:08:26 AM 233 Views
your example does not quite work for this situation moondog - 18/05/2011 01:49:02 AM 558 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM* random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM 224 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first moondog - 18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM 552 Views
OK I will use smaller words random thoughts - 18/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 578 Views
spelling it out for you moondog - 18/05/2011 04:18:45 PM 640 Views
I'm happy with it. *NM* callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:04:42 AM 361 Views
Molestation Knightscape - 18/05/2011 04:22:19 AM 765 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes