It loops back to information, when gets back to Facts within like 5 links.
I amuse myself.
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text?
- 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM
1103 Views
I did.
- 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM
790 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd..
- 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM
722 Views
They're talking about the rollover text
*NM*
- 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM
330 Views
*NM*
- 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM
330 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM*
- 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM
357 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd
- 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM
701 Views
Me!
- 25/05/2011 07:22:50 PM
956 Views
Yeah. Someone sabotaged the "Facts" article
- 25/05/2011 07:29:45 PM
745 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is...
- 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM
747 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd.
- 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM
791 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM*
- 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM
401 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM*
- 26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM
333 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh
- 26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM
744 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago.
- 26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM
753 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM*
- 26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM
307 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic.
- 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM
1051 Views

*NM*