Just because I can't go 0-60 in two pumps and ejaculate quicker like the foreskined can doesn't mean there isn't intense pleasure in orgasm (this being a major, major difference compared to female circumcision). If anything, being able to delay orgasm a bit longer might be a good thing. As for the hygiene, cock cleaning isn't exactly one of those things stressed in those school/health PSAs, or at least it wasn't when I was growing up in the late 70s-early 90s. Considering how easy it was to develop jock itch while playing sports (and maintaining a decent level of personal hygiene), I'd hate to think of all that smegma produced as well.

It's a cultural thing these days. Some don't like it that parents choose it, just like some hate those parents who pierce their girls' ears soon after birth or at any time before 18. It's a religious practice for some as well, based likely on some sort of cleanliness laws in antiquity. It's not like the State enforces circumcision against parental consent. People who advocate the banning of this, of the removal of parental choice, might be approaching it in the wrong fashion, as quite a few Americans along a wide political spectrum do not care much for universal bans of any sort. Add to this stupid, offensive comics such as this and it makes some wonder about the backgrounds of those who are advocating a ban rather than an education of foreskin pros/cons to the parents.