Active Users:1315 Time:01/05/2026 11:14:39 PM
There is a 1935 supreme court case about this matter Roland00 Send a noteboard - 01/07/2011 10:02:58 AM
and while it isn't a perfect comparison to the situation, I as a non-lawyer find it to be a very similar situation, so as a lawyer Tom please point to me the difference between this situation and the past supreme court case Perry v. United States (1935).


Perry v. United States (1935)
Reply to message
It would amuse me to see the 14th Amendment used to side-step the debt ceiling argument - 29/06/2011 02:39:35 AM 1086 Views
Christ, Just cut spending already *NM* - 29/06/2011 03:24:07 AM 258 Views
+1 - we spend TOO MUCH DAMN MONEY.....cut, cut, cut, cut. *NM* - 29/06/2011 04:54:56 AM 224 Views
I'm curious. - 29/06/2011 06:18:12 AM 617 Views
Easy answers = Yes, No, No - 29/06/2011 01:02:58 PM 614 Views
You know, it's kinda funny. (edited with data correction) - 29/06/2011 02:07:55 PM 808 Views
... and raise taxes. - 29/06/2011 11:18:41 AM 769 Views
Absolutely NO TAX INCREASES until..... - 29/06/2011 01:04:55 PM 590 Views
Agreed. - 29/06/2011 10:02:43 AM 750 Views
Idiocy. Note the "authorized by law" clause. - 29/06/2011 02:07:24 PM 563 Views
You know.... - 29/06/2011 04:08:31 PM 625 Views
There is a 1935 supreme court case about this matter - 01/07/2011 10:02:58 AM 811 Views

Reply to Message