Active Users:592 Time:30/10/2026 08:10:06 AM
There is a 1935 supreme court case about this matter Roland00 Send a noteboard - 01/07/2011 10:02:58 AM
and while it isn't a perfect comparison to the situation, I as a non-lawyer find it to be a very similar situation, so as a lawyer Tom please point to me the difference between this situation and the past supreme court case Perry v. United States (1935).


Perry v. United States (1935)
Reply to message
It would amuse me to see the 14th Amendment used to side-step the debt ceiling argument - 29/06/2011 02:39:35 AM 1169 Views
Christ, Just cut spending already *NM* - 29/06/2011 03:24:07 AM 288 Views
+1 - we spend TOO MUCH DAMN MONEY.....cut, cut, cut, cut. *NM* - 29/06/2011 04:54:56 AM 254 Views
I'm curious. - 29/06/2011 06:18:12 AM 677 Views
Easy answers = Yes, No, No - 29/06/2011 01:02:58 PM 674 Views
You know, it's kinda funny. (edited with data correction) - 29/06/2011 02:07:55 PM 883 Views
... and raise taxes. - 29/06/2011 11:18:41 AM 845 Views
Absolutely NO TAX INCREASES until..... - 29/06/2011 01:04:55 PM 655 Views
Agreed. - 29/06/2011 10:02:43 AM 810 Views
Idiocy. Note the "authorized by law" clause. - 29/06/2011 02:07:24 PM 624 Views
You know.... - 29/06/2011 04:08:31 PM 691 Views
There is a 1935 supreme court case about this matter - 01/07/2011 10:02:58 AM 877 Views

Reply to Message