Active Users:582 Time:16/09/2026 10:36:52 PM
I did read it Larry Send a noteboard - 21/08/2011 06:32:28 PM
At least, for removing some of that.

Because the project is joint US-Brazilian, and the English "dictionary" of 45 000 words is meant to be mirrored by the Brazilian version that will come out soon, they removed lots of words that would look like false friends in Portuguese. They also removed a lot of other words for different reasons.

I agree that it will be on the low side for your actual vocabulary.


I wonder how I'd do with the Brazilian Portuguese vocabulary. Probably in the low thousands.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Help out these researchers: test your English vocabulary - 21/08/2011 03:07:24 PM 939 Views
I tried to be very conservative - 21/08/2011 04:55:08 PM 688 Views
That was my thought as well - 21/08/2011 06:24:06 PM 721 Views
Indeed. If you read their explanation, however, there's a decent reason for that. - 21/08/2011 06:27:34 PM 668 Views
I did read it - 21/08/2011 06:32:28 PM 585 Views
28,300 words. - 21/08/2011 05:52:10 PM 628 Views
Hmm - 21/08/2011 06:07:36 PM 683 Views
I got 35700, but I was perhaps too generous in ticking boxes. - 21/08/2011 07:49:24 PM 735 Views
The wife had the same reaction to "lots", "somewhat" and "not much". - 21/08/2011 10:15:05 PM 715 Views
Yeah, she would. - 21/08/2011 10:54:20 PM 649 Views
That makes sense. - 22/08/2011 03:49:18 PM 727 Views
I'm going to hope I misinterpreted that, but... - 22/08/2011 07:24:04 PM 646 Views
Nah, you got it, and I didn't. - 22/08/2011 08:27:33 PM 711 Views
37700 *NM* - 21/08/2011 08:52:29 PM 253 Views
Bah, 35,000 *NM* - 21/08/2011 10:02:43 PM 285 Views
I'm only slightly above average - 22/08/2011 04:07:02 AM 627 Views
39,000. It seemed pretty heavy on the Latin derivations. *NM* - 22/08/2011 04:48:23 AM 289 Views
28,800 - 22/08/2011 01:43:36 PM 625 Views
Trollop! Trollop was on the list! Low- 22,800. *NM* - 22/08/2011 08:43:21 PM 265 Views

Reply to Message