Active Users:854 Time:15/09/2025 02:33:36 PM
But do you actually regard them that way? Nate Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM
It makes the rule somewhat subjective though; "wear and tear" are past a tipping point where the related concepts are generally regarded as elements of a single one, while "Twitter and texting" are not, despite the fact that some (e.g. DK and I) already regard them that way.


Do you often say Twitter and texting together? Whenever you mention Twitter do you add texting as well? Do you say, "I was Twittering and texting"? Do you say, "kids these days with their Twitter and texting"? Or is it just in this one particular instance and usage that you consider them to represent a singular idea, and in every other usage of them together they wouldn't be used that way? If so, then I rest my case. :p

Because you can't actually argue that specific intent on a case by case basis should inform grammar. I mean, if I were to say, "My brother and sister has a plan", that would be incorrect. If I argue that I consider my brother and my sister to both be instrumental to a plan that they came up with together from start to finish and that they should be considered a singular subject insofar as it concerns the plan, that doesn't make it grammatically correct.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1102 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 797 Views
I didn't see any errors - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 780 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 654 Views
You mean ... - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 719 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 964 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1236 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 734 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 772 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 772 Views
Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 727 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 598 Views
OK then. - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 769 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 818 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 752 Views
You're right of course! - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 835 Views
I frequently am. - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 839 Views
So I've noticed. - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 743 Views
I like telling people, too. - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 746 Views
You can use charmap. - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 791 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 711 Views
Mmm, dashing. - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 751 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 798 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 867 Views
I love this bit. - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 861 Views
Bring back the BSG! - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 772 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 727 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 868 Views
Re: serial comma. - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 743 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 711 Views
Same here - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 645 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 721 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 760 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 814 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 810 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 376 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 714 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 669 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 364 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 916 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 794 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 709 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 717 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 723 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 739 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 636 Views
But you are wrong - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 762 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 395 Views
I disagree. - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 709 Views
How utterly unsurprising - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 662 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 727 Views
Doesn't matter. - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 752 Views
What. - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 807 Views
You called? - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 768 Views
Grammar schmammar! - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 841 Views
Wongy tip #77 - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 705 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 719 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 349 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 352 Views
A timeless classic. - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 686 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 734 Views
Yes. - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 673 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 709 Views
I try - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 769 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 644 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 693 Views
I wish more people knew this. - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 667 Views
Junky Grammar. - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 662 Views

Reply to Message