Active Users:1008 Time:11/09/2026 08:05:09 AM
But do you actually regard them that way? Nate Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM
It makes the rule somewhat subjective though; "wear and tear" are past a tipping point where the related concepts are generally regarded as elements of a single one, while "Twitter and texting" are not, despite the fact that some (e.g. DK and I) already regard them that way.


Do you often say Twitter and texting together? Whenever you mention Twitter do you add texting as well? Do you say, "I was Twittering and texting"? Do you say, "kids these days with their Twitter and texting"? Or is it just in this one particular instance and usage that you consider them to represent a singular idea, and in every other usage of them together they wouldn't be used that way? If so, then I rest my case. :p

Because you can't actually argue that specific intent on a case by case basis should inform grammar. I mean, if I were to say, "My brother and sister has a plan", that would be incorrect. If I argue that I consider my brother and my sister to both be instrumental to a plan that they came up with together from start to finish and that they should be considered a singular subject insofar as it concerns the plan, that doesn't make it grammatically correct.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1204 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 906 Views
I didn't see any errors - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 891 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 764 Views
You mean ... - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 861 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 1080 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1378 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 855 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 928 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 874 Views
Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 844 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 716 Views
OK then. - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 878 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 920 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 887 Views
You're right of course! - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 953 Views
I frequently am. - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 957 Views
So I've noticed. - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 888 Views
I like telling people, too. - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 877 Views
You can use charmap. - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 910 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 813 Views
Mmm, dashing. - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 869 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 955 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 985 Views
I love this bit. - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 963 Views
Bring back the BSG! - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 917 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 839 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 988 Views
Re: serial comma. - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 872 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 847 Views
Same here - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 738 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 821 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 880 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 940 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 932 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 428 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 837 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 788 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 412 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 1038 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 927 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 857 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 839 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 835 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 860 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 747 Views
But you are wrong - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 904 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 441 Views
I disagree. - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 826 Views
How utterly unsurprising - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 821 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 854 Views
Doesn't matter. - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 852 Views
What. - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 932 Views
You called? - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 922 Views
Grammar schmammar! - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 953 Views
Wongy tip #77 - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 813 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 810 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 400 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 432 Views
A timeless classic. - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 790 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 840 Views
Yes. - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 778 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 821 Views
I try - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 888 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 740 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 837 Views
I wish more people knew this. - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 770 Views
Junky Grammar. - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 790 Views

Reply to Message