Active Users:1217 Time:01/11/2025 04:15:51 AM
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? Joel Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM
I NEVER use apostrophes in possessives (unless the noun ends in "s,") for two reasons:

1) Consistency. Contrary to the practice of centuries, the style for several decades has been, as you know, to spell "its" (the possessive form of "it") with no apostrophe to avoid confusion with "it's" (the contraction of "it is".) I merely observe that practice with all nouns and pronouns rather than in a single anomalous pronoun.

2) The aforementioned practice is sometimes justified on the grounds apostrophes represent elided letters and that none are present in a possessive construction. This is not, strictly speaking, true, because the use of apostrophe plus "s" to form English possessives reflects English forming possessives in "es" about half a millennium ago. Custom gradually elided the "e" with an apostrophe so we use apostrophe plus "s" today despite most peoples ignorance of the cause. Few but language history scholars would now recognize "es" as possessive, and it is consequently quite justifiable to drop the apostrophe altogether for possessives.

In other words, it can be argued that an apostrophe has a rightful place in both "its" and "everyones" AND that it has no place in either, but arguing it belongs in one and not the other is untenably contradictory. As with "its" and "it's" context invariably makes quite clear whether "Mikes" means "the thing belonging to Mike" or "Mike is." So much so that I have consistently avoided apostrophes in forming possessives from the day I joined wotmania yet believe this may be the first time anyone has corrected me for it. ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 05/10/2011 at 09:45:59 PM
Reply to message
Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1112 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 809 Views
I didn't see any errors - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 793 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 672 Views
You mean ... - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 752 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 989 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1265 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 757 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 794 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 780 Views
Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 740 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 608 Views
OK then. - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 783 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 832 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 786 Views
You're right of course! - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 855 Views
I frequently am. - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 856 Views
So I've noticed. - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 771 Views
I like telling people, too. - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 769 Views
You can use charmap. - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 819 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 722 Views
Mmm, dashing. - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 773 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 829 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 886 Views
I love this bit. - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 871 Views
Bring back the BSG! - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 797 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 738 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 892 Views
Re: serial comma. - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 767 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 743 Views
Same here - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 656 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 731 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 785 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 837 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 830 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 382 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 741 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 684 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 369 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 938 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 821 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 744 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 741 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 747 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 755 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 650 Views
But you are wrong - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 779 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 400 Views
I disagree. - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 723 Views
How utterly unsurprising - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 691 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 751 Views
Doesn't matter. - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 765 Views
What. - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 827 Views
You called? - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 822 Views
Grammar schmammar! - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 860 Views
Wongy tip #77 - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 723 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 729 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 356 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 366 Views
A timeless classic. - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 696 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 747 Views
Yes. - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 687 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 725 Views
I try - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 781 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 654 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 717 Views
I wish more people knew this. - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 680 Views
Junky Grammar. - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 674 Views

Reply to Message