Active Users:585 Time:08/03/2026 06:42:28 AM
Those cases are not the same, because those words are already possessive in their own right. Joel Send a noteboard - 06/10/2011 10:52:06 PM
I'm going to ignore everything apart from the bits I managed to actually read like this bit here:
No, that is the ruleS. Two of them. In direct contradiction. One of them only applied to a single word. It is not the "contraction rule" or the "possessive rule," but the "it's/its" rule. Far worse, it exists, not to make the language richer, more versatile or, heaven forbid, easier to understand, but because... well, because someone said we should ignore the rule we observe in ALL OTHER CASES, and other people, for reasons known but to them and God, accepted that decision.

Because someone is WRONG ON THE INTERNET and I feel the need to correct, obviously. It is not a rule observed in all other cases. "Its" is the same as "hers", "yours", "ours" and "theirs". Possessive pronoun. "Everyone" is an indefinite pronoun so it's different.

Except for "her" (which can be a possessive pronoun OR simply the second person feminine pronoun,) each word you list is already always a possessive pronoun. Adding "s" does not signify their (already unambiguously established) possessive nature, but that they do not refer to the word immediately following them (e.g. "your car" but not "yours car," rather, "that car is yours.") That is closer to true genitive declension than the makeshift relic apostrophe+"s" represents. I cannot recall ever seeing "its" used in that way; "it" is analogous to "my" not "mine." I (and almost certainly you) would say, for example, "the governments power to print money belongs to it," not "the governments power to print money is its."

I would also like to teach you the meaning of succinct.

In the interest of full disclosure, before moondog joined wotmania he introduced me to xkcd with "Duty Calls" to illustrate his impression of my wotmania posting habits. ;) Around that same time someone posted a wotmania thread about the Flame Warriors site, and you can probably understand why I felt this entry hit a little close to home. :<img class=' /> Beyond that I can only reiterate one of my Pithy Pet Phrases: Few things are difficult; many are complicated.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1143 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 838 Views
I didn't see any errors - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 823 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 702 Views
You mean ... - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 790 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 1016 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1301 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 790 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 825 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 808 Views
Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 769 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 651 Views
OK then. - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 811 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 860 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 820 Views
You're right of course! - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 885 Views
I frequently am. - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 894 Views
So I've noticed. - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 805 Views
I like telling people, too. - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 800 Views
You can use charmap. - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 851 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 749 Views
Mmm, dashing. - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 802 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 873 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 916 Views
I love this bit. - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 901 Views
Bring back the BSG! - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 838 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 774 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 926 Views
Re: serial comma. - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 803 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 776 Views
Same here - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 680 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 756 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 818 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 876 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 866 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 399 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 775 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 718 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 382 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 968 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 861 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 780 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 767 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 780 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 788 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 679 Views
But you are wrong - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 815 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 412 Views
I disagree. - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 758 Views
How utterly unsurprising - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 737 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 786 Views
Doesn't matter. - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 796 Views
What. - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 864 Views
Those cases are not the same, because those words are already possessive in their own right. - 06/10/2011 10:52:06 PM 852 Views
You called? - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 852 Views
Grammar schmammar! - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 886 Views
Wongy tip #77 - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 750 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 754 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 368 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 389 Views
A timeless classic. - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 727 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 779 Views
Yes. - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 716 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 754 Views
I try - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 809 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 685 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 774 Views
I wish more people knew this. - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 710 Views
Junky Grammar. - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 707 Views

Reply to Message