American politics has not needed a third party badly enough to actually form it. If and when the two-party system fails utterly (and it might, conceivably, do so in the near future) a third party will arise on its own. Given the present circumstances, a third party would probably be a moderate party that favors a liberal social agenda, fiscal conservatism, doesn't fear government but doesn't love it or trust it particularly, and tends to realism in foreign policy.
Third parties have failed in America because one of the two major parties has usually corrected course to seize the moderate middle in any election, and it has worked just fine for over a hundred years. If, as some are saying, the parties are too polarized to move back to the middle, then a third party will arise, but it is likely that it will just absorb the party that lost out the most from its formation.
However, it wouldn't be that hard to create a new party. There are enough rich people in the US who would favor the platform set out above that you could quickly find moderate candidates (and even sitting legislators) to break ranks with their former party and join the third party movement.
Third parties have failed in America because one of the two major parties has usually corrected course to seize the moderate middle in any election, and it has worked just fine for over a hundred years. If, as some are saying, the parties are too polarized to move back to the middle, then a third party will arise, but it is likely that it will just absorb the party that lost out the most from its formation.
However, it wouldn't be that hard to create a new party. There are enough rich people in the US who would favor the platform set out above that you could quickly find moderate candidates (and even sitting legislators) to break ranks with their former party and join the third party movement.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
An Open Letter to Police Officers Across America
- 20/11/2011 03:27:46 AM
1440 Views
Stupid, Stupid, Stupid.
- 20/11/2011 03:59:42 AM
913 Views
I am forced to agree.
- 20/11/2011 04:37:07 AM
748 Views
You're right, but stuff like what just happened at UC Davis makes my blood boil
- 20/11/2011 05:52:11 AM
736 Views
As such things go, that does not seem too bad to me.
- 20/11/2011 06:14:54 AM
909 Views
I'm going to start a counter protest with "Bring back the Pinkertons" signs...
- 20/11/2011 05:19:19 AM
700 Views
One of the most poorly written pieces of shit I've read in a long time. *NM*
- 20/11/2011 06:30:29 AM
400 Views
Declaring people "enemy combatants" means they get to treat you as such too.
- 20/11/2011 01:55:51 PM
712 Views
Don't cloud the propaganda with logic, Tim!
- 20/11/2011 04:16:05 PM
755 Views
That's the problem with a two-party system: it's practically impossible to form a new party. *NM*
- 20/11/2011 05:42:39 PM
310 Views
I think that's completely wrong.
- 20/11/2011 06:10:15 PM
788 Views
And implicit in my statement above is the following addendum
- 20/11/2011 06:14:40 PM
880 Views
I agree with that. However, many seem to think that means it's OK to beat them up.
- 20/11/2011 06:21:05 PM
747 Views
Only if they resist arrest, and then the force must be proportionate. *NM*
- 20/11/2011 09:52:39 PM
327 Views
If they resist a lawful arrest, sure. *NM*
- 21/11/2011 11:11:11 AM
322 Views
they are breaking the law so it is lawful to arrest them *NM*
- 21/11/2011 10:46:18 PM
319 Views
In what way?
- 22/11/2011 09:12:01 AM
719 Views
Resisting arrest. Duh. *NM*
- 22/11/2011 10:11:04 AM
326 Views
They have to be doing something else before you can lawfully arrest them.
- 22/11/2011 10:30:05 AM
640 Views
Then they should be doing what the police say. Because that's the law. *NM*
- 22/11/2011 02:28:00 PM
337 Views
You're a smart guy, Ghavrel. You can't seriously think you have to do *anything* the police say.
- 22/11/2011 03:05:06 PM
809 Views
You are not allowed to just block sidewalks and camp wherever you want
- 22/11/2011 01:54:42 PM
704 Views
Most, if not all, of the arrests have been lawful.
- 22/11/2011 01:24:55 AM
663 Views
Can you tell me any more about this permit system? *NM*
- 22/11/2011 10:04:35 AM
308 Views
Thereby hangs the tale, indeed; I would also be interested in Toms elaboration on that.
- 23/11/2011 08:54:53 AM
741 Views
(OWS isn't anti-capitalism)
- 20/11/2011 06:39:37 PM
662 Views
It's almost impossible for you to say what OWS is when it refuses to define itself.
- 20/11/2011 08:44:12 PM
727 Views
Re: It's almost impossible for you to say what OWS is when it refuses to define itself.
- 22/11/2011 04:20:59 AM
787 Views
Why are liberals such whiners?
- 21/11/2011 01:51:03 PM
901 Views
There you go again....
- 21/11/2011 11:05:04 PM
823 Views
- 21/11/2011 11:05:04 PM
823 Views
it is a little hypocritical of the guy who called the Tea Party racsit to talk about broad brushes *NM*
- 22/11/2011 04:02:56 AM
456 Views
One of these days you should try responding to me with more than "that thing you just said? YOU!"
- 22/11/2011 06:11:20 AM
655 Views
one of these days you will respond without going into off topic rants
- 22/11/2011 02:02:46 PM
919 Views
A tangent is not a non sequitur, though in this case I do not feel guilty of either.
- 23/11/2011 08:12:09 AM
829 Views
oh and stop with the the stupid BS about the Fed veing threatened it is getting old
- 22/11/2011 04:05:10 AM
692 Views
Saying a person would not like what one did to him if he came to ones state is a threat.
- 22/11/2011 06:13:35 AM
756 Views
No it is just another pathetic attempt of the left to believe the right are bad guys
- 22/11/2011 01:50:32 PM
604 Views
Saying one will take an unpleasant action against another is a threat, any way you slice it.
- 23/11/2011 08:17:44 AM
696 Views
You've posted this, but you don't seem inclined to defend it, one might ask what the point was?
- 21/11/2011 05:16:13 PM
667 Views

*NM*
*NM*