I am aware I have the most posts, by a fair margin, despite posting less than ever. I am also aware, as you surely are also, that would NOT be the highest total for virtually any two years in wotmanias history. I joined wotmania in summer of '04, lurked for six months and hit the 10k mark in mid-2007. Then I started working 12 hours a day and chasing a girl at another site, but still hit 20k a couple weeks before wotmania closed (though it required conscious effort.) Continuing at my current prolific rate would inaugurate RAFOs 10k club in about a year; Camilla, who has the second most posts, would join me about a year after THAT. That seems far more significant than my (nearly) 7000 posts (though I am pleased my 37+ views/post ratio is almost twice what it was on my best day at wotmania.)
I post less than ever. Until 2007 I was heavily active on three or more sites at any given time; now my activity is almost exclusively here. It looks like I post a lot here because so few others join me; when I posted more often at wotmania I never accounted for even 2% of the CMB, let alone 3% of the whole SITE (as is the case at RAFO.) While it is very flattering to suggest I almost singlehandedly altered RAFOs activity, we all know that is not the case. I can (and should) post on other RAFO MBs, and less generally, but since half of RAFOs posts are on the CMB, an inactive CMB indicates a problem much bigger than me, and thus one I cannot solve.
I genuinely regret being the sites most active member, but remain unconvinced decreasing my activity will increase the sites.
I post less than ever. Until 2007 I was heavily active on three or more sites at any given time; now my activity is almost exclusively here. It looks like I post a lot here because so few others join me; when I posted more often at wotmania I never accounted for even 2% of the CMB, let alone 3% of the whole SITE (as is the case at RAFO.) While it is very flattering to suggest I almost singlehandedly altered RAFOs activity, we all know that is not the case. I can (and should) post on other RAFO MBs, and less generally, but since half of RAFOs posts are on the CMB, an inactive CMB indicates a problem much bigger than me, and thus one I cannot solve.
I genuinely regret being the sites most active member, but remain unconvinced decreasing my activity will increase the sites.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 27/11/2011 at 12:26:37 PM
/Survey: If this place had a separate politics board like several other sites do, what would happen?
23/11/2011 10:53:33 PM
- 869 Views
Political Board = Chat Drama x 9000 *NM*
24/11/2011 12:13:58 AM
- 314 Views
I doubt that very much.
24/11/2011 01:17:07 AM
- 598 Views
Which is pretty much my point
24/11/2011 01:40:09 AM
- 614 Views
I remain unconvinced a few voices can drown out the rest in an internet environment.
25/11/2011 12:41:05 AM
- 784 Views
...said the person with the highest post count on the site. *NM*
27/11/2011 10:30:49 AM
- 306 Views
Which changes what, exactly?
27/11/2011 12:05:45 PM
- 660 Views
the problem with the chat drama is spilled over into everything else
28/11/2011 05:47:14 PM
- 580 Views
All the political crap would go there, like it does on those other sites.
24/11/2011 01:09:11 AM
- 608 Views
Perhaps some might feel more comfortable posting if it were separate?
24/11/2011 01:41:15 AM
- 569 Views
Probably the easiest solution is to have a filter instead, save the new board for a "Writers Board"
24/11/2011 06:47:33 AM
- 646 Views
Perhaps
24/11/2011 09:25:40 AM
- 563 Views
There are actually a number of simple and effective solutions if this really bugs people
24/11/2011 06:35:33 PM
- 745 Views
There is a reason we are seeing so much complaining about politics form certain people
28/11/2011 05:44:22 PM
- 566 Views
You're adorable. You're also pretty new to the site, as I recall.
29/11/2011 12:41:03 AM
- 521 Views
yes I was refering to you
29/11/2011 12:37:34 PM
- 561 Views
Then you should know there are fewer conservatives on the site now.
30/11/2011 03:41:10 AM
- 539 Views
That's arguably flawed reasoning, there's apparently considerably fewer posters overall now
30/11/2011 05:24:28 AM
- 573 Views
To a certain extent. But the site's left lost LiterateDog and Chorabliss.
30/11/2011 09:15:29 AM
- 630 Views
If people want to keep the place alive and interesting for themselves then they can do these things:
24/11/2011 08:51:11 AM
- 682 Views
The first is no option at all
24/11/2011 09:24:24 AM
- 608 Views
It wasn't aimed at you specifically.
24/11/2011 10:10:05 AM
- 659 Views
Writing past 3 AM is not going to lead to clear connections, sometimes
24/11/2011 10:22:34 AM
- 686 Views
Re: Writing past 3 AM is not going to lead to clear connections, sometimes
24/11/2011 11:15:31 PM
- 609 Views
there would be so little traffic on the community board that you could shut it down
28/11/2011 05:20:10 PM
- 515 Views