Active Users:702 Time:17/03/2026 12:45:57 PM
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that. Joel Send a noteboard - 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM
on the one hand, they don't want themselves filmed in public because they think they're entitled to privacy when they are doing their job ...IN PUBLIC.

but yet they are willing to place a GPS tracker on your car without a warrant because they think your personal driveway is a public place and therefore fair game thank goodness the supreme court knocked that one back down, maybe they can get around to the filming issue this year too...

I remembered hearing about it (and the article does reference it,) but not a final SCOTUS verdict. These days I just take it for granted that the SCOTUS will side with the government in all cases unless they were brought by a member of the GOP. Thank God for small blessings, I suppose.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement - 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM 1160 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap - 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM 717 Views
There's a simple solution to this - 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM 649 Views
Yeah, funny how well THAT worked. - 03/02/2012 02:59:17 AM 711 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape? - 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM 744 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day - 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM 664 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me - 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM 732 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public - 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM 677 Views
There are lots of jobs like that - 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM 693 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them? - 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM 772 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments? - 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM 606 Views
As joel pointed those cameras have off switches - 03/02/2012 06:02:51 PM 717 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM* - 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM 247 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM* - 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM 253 Views
Movie projectionists do. *NM* - 04/02/2012 12:20:21 AM 203 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid.... - 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM 636 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do? - 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM 893 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance - 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM 720 Views
I think we could find a middle ground - 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM 604 Views
I can sign on for all of that. - 03/02/2012 06:57:54 AM 702 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground - 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM 636 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard - 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM 631 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that. - 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM 582 Views
9-0 decision -- where were you? - 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM 674 Views
Um, Norway? - 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM 649 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door - 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM 620 Views
That is an unnervingly good point. - 03/02/2012 07:13:48 PM 680 Views

Reply to Message