I really have no idea what you are going on about in this rant
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 03/02/2012 05:31:40 PM
If there was something in all of that justifies judging people based on out of context video I missed it. I tried to figure out how Rod Blagojevich played into this but all I seemed to get is that since he used the context matters argument it has now be soiled and context no longer matters. Sorry thats dumb.
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement
- 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM
1220 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap
- 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM
755 Views
There's a simple solution to this
- 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM
696 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape?
- 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM
791 Views
I have had two, that I recall off the top of my head; SOME of us are NOT too good for some jobs. 
- 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM
644 Views
- 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM
644 Views
yes so we would end up with people like you as cops, thanks for making my point
- 03/02/2012 04:09:54 AM
626 Views
So if your point is invalid the problem is me; glad to see you are being objective here.
- 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
598 Views
- 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
598 Views
If there were mobs of anger idiots looking set up situation where you could be defaimed
- 03/02/2012 04:50:36 AM
671 Views
If it makes you feel better, Rod Blagojevich agrees context ALWAYS exonerates ANYTHING.
- 03/02/2012 07:24:55 AM
858 Views
I really have no idea what you are going on about in this rant
- 03/02/2012 05:31:40 PM
788 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day
- 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM
713 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me
- 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM
783 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public
- 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM
728 Views
There are lots of jobs like that
- 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM
745 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them?
- 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM
832 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments?
- 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM
646 Views
Yes and no; in many cases they can and do turn off the cameras when it suits them.
- 03/02/2012 02:33:32 PM
826 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM
267 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM*
- 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM
273 Views
Write a sentence that can be understood and maybe I'll reply with something relevant. *NM*
- 04/02/2012 04:57:27 PM
243 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid....
- 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM
687 Views
luck for my job isn't so hard. Judging you as stupid is an easy call
- 03/02/2012 03:46:12 AM
734 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do?
- 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM
944 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance
- 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM
760 Views
I think we could find a middle ground
- 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM
651 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground
- 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM
688 Views
Um, HELLO, it is a felony for journalists to tape police in IL, too.
- 03/02/2012 07:16:15 PM
699 Views
That is definitely the problem, though casting aspersions on everyone you can think of hurts, too.
- 03/02/2012 06:55:30 AM
887 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard
- 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM
672 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that.
- 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM
636 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door
- 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM
673 Views