No, it probably means we will get more and worse than ever.
Joel Send a noteboard - 01/03/2012 11:25:25 PM
I think he was waiting until he secured the nomination to pull out his more controversial ideas, like federally-mandated huts for women to live in during their periods.
It has already started, as Tom pointed out: Even by MI we were treated to the spectacle of Santorum robocalling MI Dems begging for their votes to stop Romney, despite once lambasting Democrats "spoiling" Republican primaries. Those must have been interesting calls; he could hardly say, "a vote for me is a vote for Obama," since Romney would have skewered him with that throughout the remaining primaries. As it is, he has already told a press conference Santorum was "wearing the other teams jersey," and nothing like Romney voting for Tsongas in 1992 solely to give Bush 41 an easier opponent than Clinton.

Yet as the delegate math becomes increasingly impossible for Santorum he will only get more desperate, frantic and pathetic. Expecting otherwise would be expecting him to know when he is licked, and if he knew that he would have retired after Bob Casey thumped him by almost 20% in PA six years ago. The only thing he has going for him against Romney is playing the "real conservative" card, so he will milk it for all it is worth. With a primary left in Gingrichs adopted GA, the only reason we will not see Santorum in a white sheet by the weekend is because he is Catholic.
If nothing else, while the notion of Romney running with Ron Paul is absurd, a marriage of convenience between Romney and Santorum is more plausible. Santorum brings something to the table (his sizable pull with conservative voters, which Paul utterly lacks.) Staying in the race and finishing a respectable second in every primary would deepen his appeal as a running mate, and about the only way Romney can get rid of him before the end of spring would be to publicly make the offer, which he could not rescind without completely destroying his credibility with everyone.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 01/03/2012 at 11:30:17 PM
Now That Romney Is Officially the Republican Presidential Nominee: Pick the President!
- 29/02/2012 08:29:02 PM
1572 Views
- 29/02/2012 08:29:02 PM
1572 Views
I agree Romney will be the candidate.
- 29/02/2012 08:54:52 PM
852 Views
I would say the math favors Romney over Obama, but it will probably be close either way.
- 01/03/2012 03:37:52 PM
943 Views
I have never understood the point of the Electoral College.
- 29/02/2012 11:39:11 PM
929 Views
You don't think like a politician then
- 01/03/2012 12:38:36 AM
982 Views
- 01/03/2012 12:38:36 AM
982 Views
I certainly hadn't considered much of that. I'm glad you posted it. *NM*
- 01/03/2012 07:15:03 AM
419 Views
I also have not seen most of that mentioned in the popular vs. electoral debate.
- 01/03/2012 02:34:31 PM
868 Views
a bit simplistic and unrealistic
- 02/03/2012 11:44:02 PM
917 Views
When illustrating a point realism is not required and simplicity is a plus
- 03/03/2012 03:04:26 AM
957 Views
I have a couple quibbles.
- 03/03/2012 05:23:46 AM
960 Views
Oh, certainly, I'm over-generalizing but I was already getting long-winded
- 03/03/2012 06:52:04 AM
894 Views
What a bunch of waffle!
- 03/03/2012 10:47:19 AM
1054 Views
Also I don't like this refrain that implies only the POTUS vote matters
- 03/03/2012 03:29:58 AM
1060 Views
IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
- 03/03/2012 05:57:41 AM
871 Views
Re: IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
- 03/03/2012 07:02:30 AM
910 Views
*is learning*
- 04/03/2012 09:49:42 PM
884 Views
Re: *is learning*
- 04/03/2012 09:56:16 PM
924 Views
Re: *is learning*
- 05/03/2012 12:08:08 AM
963 Views
You could imitate the French.
- 07/03/2012 10:40:16 PM
869 Views
- 07/03/2012 10:40:16 PM
869 Views
That seems... unlikely....
- 08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM
892 Views
- 08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM
892 Views
It does, doesn't it?
- 08/03/2012 06:11:08 PM
1050 Views
- 08/03/2012 06:11:08 PM
1050 Views
After I thought about it more, I realized France and the US are not so different in that respect.
- 08/03/2012 08:51:03 PM
842 Views
More similar than the other major Western democracies at least, agreed.
- 08/03/2012 09:32:55 PM
839 Views
I did not realize lack of a parliamentary majority dictated his cabinet.
- 09/03/2012 12:27:31 AM
912 Views
I don't know much about Norwegian politics, but you seem to be wrong.
- 03/03/2012 06:18:08 PM
911 Views
Do you happen to have that link, please?
- 03/03/2012 06:46:31 PM
802 Views
Sure.
- 03/03/2012 06:58:07 PM
992 Views
Guess we did not read far enough.
- 03/03/2012 10:38:07 PM
919 Views
Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
- 03/03/2012 11:49:44 PM
1124 Views
Hey, man, I am an AMERICAN: I do not HAVE to know ANYTHING!
- 04/03/2012 11:46:57 PM
1128 Views
- 04/03/2012 11:46:57 PM
1128 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
- 05/03/2012 06:56:24 AM
921 Views
The thing is, regions often have national relevance far greater than their populations would suggest
- 05/03/2012 10:21:26 AM
881 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
- 08/03/2012 07:11:12 PM
877 Views
Many valid reasons, including those Isaac cited.
- 02/03/2012 02:26:37 AM
1031 Views
Most states are ignored anyway
- 02/03/2012 11:56:12 PM
1097 Views
Only because and to the extent they have already committed themselves.
- 03/03/2012 03:41:39 AM
942 Views
Why would we do something logical? Dude, you're utterly ridiculous. *NM*
- 05/03/2012 04:53:38 PM
466 Views
I'm kind of sad- does this mean Santorum won't be providing wonderful sound bites anymore?
- 01/03/2012 02:22:31 PM
845 Views
No, it probably means we will get more and worse than ever.
- 01/03/2012 11:25:25 PM
1015 Views
Romney or Obama, either way, America loses. *NM*
- 02/03/2012 01:10:26 AM
631 Views
Hard to dispute that either; six of one, half a dozen of the other.
- 02/03/2012 01:38:07 AM
821 Views
I'd agree hope and change was extremely unrealistic
- 02/03/2012 11:58:57 PM
823 Views
Well, you know my story there; I voted for Obama and got Hillary (at best.)
- 03/03/2012 01:43:20 AM
843 Views
Update: Despite rules requiring they be split, the MI GOP is giving Romney BOTH statewide delegates.
- 02/03/2012 11:10:56 PM
952 Views
Romney is damaged
- 02/03/2012 11:27:33 PM
820 Views
Obama is rather damaged also; it will probably come down to FL and OH, yet again.
- 03/03/2012 02:23:53 AM
964 Views
I'm hoping for Rubio as VP... then FL probably won't matter
- 03/03/2012 04:28:08 AM
819 Views
You should put that on your license plates.
- 03/03/2012 06:41:34 AM
979 Views
- 03/03/2012 06:41:34 AM
979 Views
And what are you basing all of this on?
- 03/03/2012 09:54:06 PM
932 Views
The closeness of several states when Obama was far more popular, and UTs heavily Mormon neighbors.
- 03/03/2012 11:44:06 PM
902 Views
Wrong
- 04/03/2012 08:08:56 AM
1014 Views
Higher turnout magnifies the Mormon effect.
- 04/03/2012 08:08:09 PM
1070 Views
Your reasoning is flawed and if you can't see it there is no hope for you
- 05/03/2012 11:39:04 PM
999 Views
Yeah, I think we had that conversation already, several times, in fact.
- 07/03/2012 05:36:45 AM
802 Views
Do you have any knowledge of statistics at all?
- 07/03/2012 09:04:15 PM
977 Views
I hate this message board
- 07/03/2012 09:06:30 PM
766 Views
It would probably help if you deleted the stuff from two, three posts back?
- 07/03/2012 09:25:40 PM
862 Views


