The validity of the complaint matters a great deal to whether we or anyone should credit it; in this case, that means we should not. There is a good argument for Norway using leveling seats and extra seats for specific regions (they do not repeat a re-apportionment nightmare in 50 states each decade) to distribute power and prevent individual tyrants. There is an argument for Britain doing so by essentially making the Speaker of the House also President (though if anything that just unwisely concentrates power.) There is NO argument America should elect the president by direct national popular vote like Britain, because neither it nor any European country of which I am aware does so.
The French elect their president by direct national popular vote - and when the president's party also controls the French parliament, he's a pretty powerful man. (When it doesn't, he's not - their system is interesting that way, in most other countries the respective powers of president and PM, assuming both functions exist, are well-delineated and clear regardless of which party holds which.)
Of course, the French election system does have two rounds (if no candidate gets 50% of the vote in the first round, there's a second round between the two candidates with the most votes), which can backfire spectacularly like in 2002 when the far-right candidate snuck into the second round, the socialist candidate having lost too many votes to the various communist parties (yes, France has multiple communist parties...). Chirac got a record landslide victory in the second round as a result, but it was hardly something to be proud of. In short, not exactly a system anyone would want to imitate.

Yet another argument for Instant Runoff Voting (or Preferential Voting, of one prefers.) Personally, I would prefer America institute that and let everyone vote in both primaries, but do not expect either to happen soon.
I'm rather puzzled by your comment about the British Speaker of the House being President... what did you mean by that?
I did qualify that slightly, but I meant the PM is the head of government as well as of the legislature. That makes implementing checks and balances harder.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Now That Romney Is Officially the Republican Presidential Nominee: Pick the President!
- 29/02/2012 08:29:02 PM
1524 Views
- 29/02/2012 08:29:02 PM
1524 Views
I agree Romney will be the candidate.
- 29/02/2012 08:54:52 PM
815 Views
I would say the math favors Romney over Obama, but it will probably be close either way.
- 01/03/2012 03:37:52 PM
906 Views
I have never understood the point of the Electoral College.
- 29/02/2012 11:39:11 PM
890 Views
You don't think like a politician then
- 01/03/2012 12:38:36 AM
943 Views
- 01/03/2012 12:38:36 AM
943 Views
I certainly hadn't considered much of that. I'm glad you posted it. *NM*
- 01/03/2012 07:15:03 AM
399 Views
I also have not seen most of that mentioned in the popular vs. electoral debate.
- 01/03/2012 02:34:31 PM
833 Views
a bit simplistic and unrealistic
- 02/03/2012 11:44:02 PM
882 Views
When illustrating a point realism is not required and simplicity is a plus
- 03/03/2012 03:04:26 AM
917 Views
I have a couple quibbles.
- 03/03/2012 05:23:46 AM
922 Views
Oh, certainly, I'm over-generalizing but I was already getting long-winded
- 03/03/2012 06:52:04 AM
863 Views
What a bunch of waffle!
- 03/03/2012 10:47:19 AM
1024 Views
Also I don't like this refrain that implies only the POTUS vote matters
- 03/03/2012 03:29:58 AM
1023 Views
IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
- 03/03/2012 05:57:41 AM
831 Views
Re: IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
- 03/03/2012 07:02:30 AM
874 Views
*is learning*
- 04/03/2012 09:49:42 PM
851 Views
Re: *is learning*
- 04/03/2012 09:56:16 PM
890 Views
Re: *is learning*
- 05/03/2012 12:08:08 AM
926 Views
You could imitate the French.
- 07/03/2012 10:40:16 PM
837 Views
- 07/03/2012 10:40:16 PM
837 Views
That seems... unlikely....
- 08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM
862 Views
- 08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM
862 Views
It does, doesn't it?
- 08/03/2012 06:11:08 PM
1021 Views
- 08/03/2012 06:11:08 PM
1021 Views
After I thought about it more, I realized France and the US are not so different in that respect.
- 08/03/2012 08:51:03 PM
803 Views
More similar than the other major Western democracies at least, agreed.
- 08/03/2012 09:32:55 PM
812 Views
I did not realize lack of a parliamentary majority dictated his cabinet.
- 09/03/2012 12:27:31 AM
880 Views
I don't know much about Norwegian politics, but you seem to be wrong.
- 03/03/2012 06:18:08 PM
886 Views
Do you happen to have that link, please?
- 03/03/2012 06:46:31 PM
773 Views
Sure.
- 03/03/2012 06:58:07 PM
951 Views
Guess we did not read far enough.
- 03/03/2012 10:38:07 PM
877 Views
Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
- 03/03/2012 11:49:44 PM
1094 Views
Hey, man, I am an AMERICAN: I do not HAVE to know ANYTHING!
- 04/03/2012 11:46:57 PM
1092 Views
- 04/03/2012 11:46:57 PM
1092 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
- 05/03/2012 06:56:24 AM
886 Views
The thing is, regions often have national relevance far greater than their populations would suggest
- 05/03/2012 10:21:26 AM
848 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
- 08/03/2012 07:11:12 PM
830 Views
Many valid reasons, including those Isaac cited.
- 02/03/2012 02:26:37 AM
991 Views
Most states are ignored anyway
- 02/03/2012 11:56:12 PM
1048 Views
Only because and to the extent they have already committed themselves.
- 03/03/2012 03:41:39 AM
905 Views
Why would we do something logical? Dude, you're utterly ridiculous. *NM*
- 05/03/2012 04:53:38 PM
451 Views
I'm kind of sad- does this mean Santorum won't be providing wonderful sound bites anymore?
- 01/03/2012 02:22:31 PM
817 Views
Romney or Obama, either way, America loses. *NM*
- 02/03/2012 01:10:26 AM
619 Views
Hard to dispute that either; six of one, half a dozen of the other.
- 02/03/2012 01:38:07 AM
784 Views
I'd agree hope and change was extremely unrealistic
- 02/03/2012 11:58:57 PM
796 Views
Well, you know my story there; I voted for Obama and got Hillary (at best.)
- 03/03/2012 01:43:20 AM
815 Views
Update: Despite rules requiring they be split, the MI GOP is giving Romney BOTH statewide delegates.
- 02/03/2012 11:10:56 PM
905 Views
Romney is damaged
- 02/03/2012 11:27:33 PM
785 Views
Obama is rather damaged also; it will probably come down to FL and OH, yet again.
- 03/03/2012 02:23:53 AM
929 Views
I'm hoping for Rubio as VP... then FL probably won't matter
- 03/03/2012 04:28:08 AM
786 Views
You should put that on your license plates.
- 03/03/2012 06:41:34 AM
935 Views
- 03/03/2012 06:41:34 AM
935 Views
And what are you basing all of this on?
- 03/03/2012 09:54:06 PM
898 Views
The closeness of several states when Obama was far more popular, and UTs heavily Mormon neighbors.
- 03/03/2012 11:44:06 PM
855 Views
Wrong
- 04/03/2012 08:08:56 AM
982 Views
Higher turnout magnifies the Mormon effect.
- 04/03/2012 08:08:09 PM
1029 Views
Your reasoning is flawed and if you can't see it there is no hope for you
- 05/03/2012 11:39:04 PM
959 Views
Yeah, I think we had that conversation already, several times, in fact.
- 07/03/2012 05:36:45 AM
775 Views
Do you have any knowledge of statistics at all?
- 07/03/2012 09:04:15 PM
945 Views
I hate this message board
- 07/03/2012 09:06:30 PM
723 Views
It would probably help if you deleted the stuff from two, three posts back?
- 07/03/2012 09:25:40 PM
837 Views


