Active Users:760 Time:15/10/2025 08:17:11 PM
It is not like I just pulled it out of my rear, any more than my HS history text or Wikipedia did. Joel Send a noteboard - 11/03/2012 04:57:31 AM
Just admit you're wrong and don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Iconoclasm was a non-issue in the Schism. The turmoil it caused in the East only tangentially led to the Schism in that Rome's interference gave it, centuries later, a precedent for papal supremacy. Period.

Did it cause the Schism? No. Would the Schism have happened without it? Yes. Did it have no effect on pre-Schism East/West relations? If the Pope intervened on behalf of iconophile Patriarchs and Charlemagne wrote a condemnation of iconoclasts based on erroneous belief they were iconophiles, it is hard to argue it did not.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 11/03/2012 at 05:00:10 AM
Reply to message
Atheism: The Iconoclasm of the West? - 10/03/2012 05:42:56 AM 1455 Views
I think about as highly of athiesm as I do of christianity. *NM* - 10/03/2012 05:54:20 AM 422 Views
I would chide you on that basis for having a love/hate relationship with God, but who does not? - 10/03/2012 06:05:11 AM 664 Views
If the divine made men... - 10/03/2012 06:27:42 AM 657 Views
True, but by the same token, in denying our nature we deny the divine. - 10/03/2012 06:57:40 AM 673 Views
I was actually just saying in Skype this is the first post you've made in a long time I've enjoyed. - 10/03/2012 07:02:56 AM 689 Views
Thanks? It is all Dans fault, really. - 10/03/2012 07:21:19 AM 949 Views
But you do comparable things all the time! - 10/03/2012 08:35:31 AM 892 Views
You've made this analogy before and it's still a bad one, those aren't comparable - 10/03/2012 03:43:08 PM 777 Views
You said what I was thinking far more respectfully than I probably would have. - 11/03/2012 12:14:55 AM 738 Views
... and apparently it was a waste of time - 11/03/2012 03:27:04 AM 668 Views
Perhaps he just missed it in all my spam? - 11/03/2012 04:59:31 AM 739 Views
Basically what Isaac said. *NM* - 10/03/2012 07:22:07 PM 367 Views
who? *NM* - 11/03/2012 12:00:13 AM 340 Views
Me - 11/03/2012 03:31:51 AM 719 Views
You're right and wrong. - 10/03/2012 05:09:32 PM 1113 Views
Re: You're right and wrong. - 11/03/2012 12:28:25 AM 1012 Views
Nope, Buddhists are explicitly atheist and also explicitly Ontologically engaged - 11/03/2012 01:39:20 AM 1002 Views
Actually, Buddhists are not explicitly atheist in the conventional sense of the world. - 11/03/2012 02:42:36 AM 811 Views
Yeah, that's very true. - 11/03/2012 03:27:09 PM 905 Views
My Buddhist readings are definitely Tibet-focused. - 11/03/2012 04:00:17 PM 960 Views
Duplicate post *NM* - 11/03/2012 03:28:58 PM 444 Views
What exactly do you mean by "The irreparable damage it inflicted in the Great Schism"? - 10/03/2012 07:57:59 PM 855 Views
That Byzantiums iconoclasm was one of the many wedges between it and Rome that led to the Schism. - 11/03/2012 12:27:05 AM 771 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 01:54:07 AM 862 Views
I did not say it was decisive, but that it did irreparable damage to the relationship. - 11/03/2012 04:23:43 AM 872 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 04:30:08 AM 736 Views
It is not like I just pulled it out of my rear, any more than my HS history text or Wikipedia did. - 11/03/2012 04:57:31 AM 811 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 05:14:01 AM 883 Views
Irreparable damage is damage that cannot be repaired, not necessarily serious or fatal. - 11/03/2012 10:34:57 AM 951 Views
ο κοπρος. του ταυρου. - 11/03/2012 02:19:11 PM 920 Views
Very edifying; can you do Mandarin or Swahili next? - 12/03/2012 05:47:23 PM 820 Views
No. Even English seems to be beyond your grasp. - 12/03/2012 06:29:50 PM 722 Views
Citing scripture does not justify telling me to kill myself. - 13/03/2012 12:08:02 AM 872 Views
I'm not telling you to; God is. - 13/03/2012 12:35:45 AM 637 Views
Or can only you use that sort of specious logic? *NM* - 13/03/2012 03:50:20 PM 327 Views
And re: particular bullshit - 11/03/2012 02:33:15 PM 827 Views
Re: And re: particular bullshit - 13/03/2012 12:07:42 AM 746 Views
Give it up already. You are wrong. - 12/03/2012 12:53:37 AM 1027 Views

Reply to Message