Active Users:331 Time:04/12/2025 01:30:24 PM
Perhaps he just missed it in all my spam? Joel Send a noteboard - 11/03/2012 04:59:31 AM
Been a long time since I argued for giving someone the benefit of a doubt against my better judgement. Far too long.... :[
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Atheism: The Iconoclasm of the West? - 10/03/2012 05:42:56 AM 1489 Views
I think about as highly of athiesm as I do of christianity. *NM* - 10/03/2012 05:54:20 AM 442 Views
I would chide you on that basis for having a love/hate relationship with God, but who does not? - 10/03/2012 06:05:11 AM 694 Views
If the divine made men... - 10/03/2012 06:27:42 AM 682 Views
True, but by the same token, in denying our nature we deny the divine. - 10/03/2012 06:57:40 AM 705 Views
I was actually just saying in Skype this is the first post you've made in a long time I've enjoyed. - 10/03/2012 07:02:56 AM 723 Views
Thanks? It is all Dans fault, really. - 10/03/2012 07:21:19 AM 989 Views
But you do comparable things all the time! - 10/03/2012 08:35:31 AM 926 Views
You've made this analogy before and it's still a bad one, those aren't comparable - 10/03/2012 03:43:08 PM 813 Views
You said what I was thinking far more respectfully than I probably would have. - 11/03/2012 12:14:55 AM 774 Views
... and apparently it was a waste of time - 11/03/2012 03:27:04 AM 703 Views
Perhaps he just missed it in all my spam? - 11/03/2012 04:59:31 AM 771 Views
Basically what Isaac said. *NM* - 10/03/2012 07:22:07 PM 378 Views
who? *NM* - 11/03/2012 12:00:13 AM 355 Views
Me - 11/03/2012 03:31:51 AM 754 Views
You're right and wrong. - 10/03/2012 05:09:32 PM 1157 Views
Re: You're right and wrong. - 11/03/2012 12:28:25 AM 1053 Views
Nope, Buddhists are explicitly atheist and also explicitly Ontologically engaged - 11/03/2012 01:39:20 AM 1045 Views
Actually, Buddhists are not explicitly atheist in the conventional sense of the world. - 11/03/2012 02:42:36 AM 856 Views
Yeah, that's very true. - 11/03/2012 03:27:09 PM 951 Views
My Buddhist readings are definitely Tibet-focused. - 11/03/2012 04:00:17 PM 1002 Views
Duplicate post *NM* - 11/03/2012 03:28:58 PM 458 Views
What exactly do you mean by "The irreparable damage it inflicted in the Great Schism"? - 10/03/2012 07:57:59 PM 883 Views
That Byzantiums iconoclasm was one of the many wedges between it and Rome that led to the Schism. - 11/03/2012 12:27:05 AM 797 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 01:54:07 AM 900 Views
I did not say it was decisive, but that it did irreparable damage to the relationship. - 11/03/2012 04:23:43 AM 902 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 04:30:08 AM 772 Views
It is not like I just pulled it out of my rear, any more than my HS history text or Wikipedia did. - 11/03/2012 04:57:31 AM 839 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 05:14:01 AM 911 Views
Irreparable damage is damage that cannot be repaired, not necessarily serious or fatal. - 11/03/2012 10:34:57 AM 975 Views
ο κοπρος. του ταυρου. - 11/03/2012 02:19:11 PM 955 Views
Very edifying; can you do Mandarin or Swahili next? - 12/03/2012 05:47:23 PM 845 Views
No. Even English seems to be beyond your grasp. - 12/03/2012 06:29:50 PM 763 Views
Citing scripture does not justify telling me to kill myself. - 13/03/2012 12:08:02 AM 912 Views
I'm not telling you to; God is. - 13/03/2012 12:35:45 AM 671 Views
Or can only you use that sort of specious logic? *NM* - 13/03/2012 03:50:20 PM 341 Views
And re: particular bullshit - 11/03/2012 02:33:15 PM 867 Views
Re: And re: particular bullshit - 13/03/2012 12:07:42 AM 782 Views
Give it up already. You are wrong. - 12/03/2012 12:53:37 AM 1061 Views

Reply to Message