this is why it will be 2004 all over again if romney is nominated
moondog Send a noteboard - 16/03/2012 02:22:26 PM
The country was in much better shape then and the economy was performing very, very well.
Obviously, Iraq was turning into a mess, but still, at home, it was a party compared to today.
Obviously, Iraq was turning into a mess, but still, at home, it was a party compared to today.
a weak, opposition party candidate who is already painted as a flip-flopper, from massachusetts, fabulously wealthy, who doesn't know the first thing about the average voter against a president roughly half the country is ambivalent about but not enough people outright hate. romney is too weak of a candidate to pull off a victory.
christie or daniels would have been a better candidate to actually stand up against him, but they both know they have a much better chance in 2016 when obama can't run again. it is VERY difficult to unseat an incumbent who hasn't run the country into the ground and/or who hasn't used up his political capital. bush 41 was the last one in recent memory, carter before that. both had situations where people were completely fed up with the way the country was being run, and both were defeated by STRONG candidates in the election.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
can *any* republican pose a challenge to obama in november?
- 14/03/2012 04:06:59 AM
1502 Views
Yes, absolutely.....
- 14/03/2012 04:12:30 AM
968 Views
"anybody but obama" is not a winning strategy
- 14/03/2012 02:28:23 PM
921 Views
It can definitely work.....don't compare 2012 to 2004.
- 14/03/2012 02:44:39 PM
794 Views
this is why it will be 2004 all over again if romney is nominated
- 16/03/2012 02:22:26 PM
861 Views
It sure as Hell is, as long as the candidate is moderate
- 14/03/2012 03:04:10 PM
1062 Views
Did you vote for Obama in 2008?
- 14/03/2012 03:47:55 PM
790 Views
Yes I did. If Romney is the candidate, I will vote Romney this year. *NM*
- 14/03/2012 08:39:41 PM
487 Views
Strongly qualifying your statement really weakens the "anyone".
*NM*
- 14/03/2012 10:14:45 PM
494 Views
*NM*
- 14/03/2012 10:14:45 PM
494 Views
The statement "anyone but Obama" can be a rallying cry, but only for the right candidates.
- 16/03/2012 01:47:48 AM
970 Views
somehow i don't see romney having much credibility versus obama
- 16/03/2012 02:16:32 PM
866 Views
Spoken like a true Obama partisan
- 16/03/2012 04:18:21 PM
847 Views
actually, i did not vote for obama in 2008 and i won't this time either
- 17/03/2012 01:02:09 PM
909 Views
Sure, if Israel hits Iran and Obama looks weak.
- 14/03/2012 04:56:23 AM
982 Views
i think iran/israel is probably the biggest issue at the moment
- 14/03/2012 02:25:29 PM
961 Views
I would put serious money on an Israeli attack before the election.
- 14/03/2012 02:56:55 PM
981 Views
I know that I would consider voting for Romney
- 14/03/2012 01:05:47 PM
937 Views
If you will pardon an impertinent question: Why?
- 14/03/2012 03:26:01 PM
912 Views
Because Obama is a complete and utter failure.....
- 14/03/2012 03:44:14 PM
852 Views
Again, I get Republicans voting Anybody but Obama, but not how anyone can be comfortable w/ Romney.
- 14/03/2012 04:06:14 PM
987 Views
Pre-convention only the incumbents favorability ratings matter much
- 14/03/2012 01:19:04 PM
959 Views
obama is not popular, but at least he has the ability to organize a national campaign
- 14/03/2012 02:18:04 PM
941 Views
No, the democratic party does, so does the GOP
- 14/03/2012 03:16:31 PM
979 Views
That's true- despite how divisive the primaries seem, the GOP will unite behind the winner
- 14/03/2012 03:44:16 PM
979 Views
Re: That's true- despite how divisive the primaries seem, the GOP will unite behind the winner
- 14/03/2012 03:59:25 PM
922 Views
Actually, my experience has been a lot of libs mean it when they say they will not for anyone.
- 14/03/2012 04:19:46 PM
788 Views
I don't want to grossly over-generalize but there are distinct trends to party demographics
- 14/03/2012 06:04:09 PM
1041 Views
I was thinking no, and here's my rationale:
- 14/03/2012 03:41:21 PM
886 Views
Much as it pains me to agree with trzaska, he is absolutely right in this case.
- 14/03/2012 04:21:43 PM
1095 Views
Interesting. So you guys are basically saying I'm right, but it might not matter
- 14/03/2012 04:53:48 PM
952 Views
Yeah, pretty much, and I would even say that is the trend in all Dem vs. Rep elections.
- 14/03/2012 04:59:30 PM
967 Views
Yes and no
- 14/03/2012 06:23:47 PM
1074 Views
Conservative cookies nomz. But I think you missed my main point...
- 14/03/2012 07:02:10 PM
917 Views
Conservative cookies nomz. But I think you missed my main point...
- 14/03/2012 07:09:24 PM
854 Views
And the cookies are not a lie... at last night's meeting, we had Thin Mints
- 15/03/2012 09:51:30 PM
945 Views
Yeah, I just meant perception
- 16/03/2012 02:39:30 AM
938 Views
One day Republicans and internet trolls alike will learn not to say weird shit to people like me.
- 15/03/2012 12:30:17 AM
1069 Views
I like this post.
- 15/03/2012 08:40:07 PM
881 Views
I don't mean to disrespect your seal, but it looks more like a cat. *NM*
- 15/03/2012 08:52:26 PM
369 Views
You've obviously never heard of a kitten seal, Mr. I-Write-An-Animal-Blog. *NM*
- 15/03/2012 09:38:47 PM
494 Views
Maybe it's a leopard seal. That someone put a cat-ear band on. *NM*
- 15/03/2012 10:07:46 PM
394 Views
Does it matter if they do? At this point, does it matter who is president? Probably not.
- 16/03/2012 02:11:45 AM
1004 Views


