I mean normally the right accuses the left of voter fraud and the left accuses the right of voter suppression, irony would be something like "Chicago officials accuse Justice Department of not looking into claims of the dead voting".
Mind clarifying the source of irony here?
I'd also like to add that Holder deserves this slap in the face after his remarks, voter fraud truly is often very hard to prosecute, since it can be difficult to show criminal intent as opposed to neglect or accident, but denying it happens is like denying jaywalking or illegal Friday night poker games occur because you never bother to prosecute them... though without the moral high ground of being able to say it's not a big deal or worth the resources to look into.
Mind clarifying the source of irony here?
I'd also like to add that Holder deserves this slap in the face after his remarks, voter fraud truly is often very hard to prosecute, since it can be difficult to show criminal intent as opposed to neglect or accident, but denying it happens is like denying jaywalking or illegal Friday night poker games occur because you never bother to prosecute them... though without the moral high ground of being able to say it's not a big deal or worth the resources to look into.
One just happens to be more noticeable than the other, depending upon one's perspective. I'd rather have a few thousand cases of the dead voting/voting twice than tens of thousands who have "malfunctions" at voter booths and being somehow restricted in their right to vote if there has to be some form of electoral irregularity. It's all a black eye and even worse when our governments in the past have lambasted other countries for their electoral irregularities. Beam in the eye and so forth.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
No voter fraud Mr. Holder? I beg to differ.....
- 09/04/2012 07:13:46 PM
775 Views
- 09/04/2012 07:13:46 PM
775 Views
The irony of a Republican-leaning person pointing this out... 
*NM*
- 09/04/2012 08:37:33 PM
193 Views
*NM*
- 09/04/2012 08:37:33 PM
193 Views
Why is it ironic?
- 09/04/2012 09:54:10 PM
520 Views
The irony is merely that of the pot and the kettle
- 10/04/2012 01:05:39 AM
413 Views
If you are referring to FL in 2000.....those machines were bought by Dems.....
- 10/04/2012 01:17:26 AM
393 Views
Was thinking more about Ohio to be honest
- 10/04/2012 01:22:55 AM
404 Views
Intentional Voting Suppression is what they are trying to do in Florida right now(due to a 2011 law)
- 10/04/2012 04:22:25 AM
570 Views
Honestly, I'm fine with convicted felons permanently losing their right to vote.....
- 10/04/2012 04:34:31 AM
380 Views
I am also fine with stupid people not being allowed to vote
- 10/04/2012 04:36:20 AM
355 Views
Agreed - stupid people should not be allowed to vote, maybe an IQ test?
- 10/04/2012 05:17:43 AM
350 Views
I don't know about permanently...
- 10/04/2012 02:10:10 PM
377 Views
Who is talking about letting felons vote in prison?
- 10/04/2012 02:24:29 PM
461 Views
The League of Women Voters, for one
- 10/04/2012 08:50:39 PM
373 Views
Well, that is simply ridiculous then, and merits no consideration.
- 10/04/2012 11:53:04 PM
483 Views
To play Devil's Advocate, there's some legitimacy to the concept
- 11/04/2012 04:24:37 AM
434 Views
Sounds like people deliberately missing the point more than anything.
- 11/04/2012 07:45:40 AM
466 Views
Ohio? When? *NM*
- 10/04/2012 04:30:29 AM
148 Views
2008.
- 10/04/2012 04:37:15 AM
354 Views
Once again, Dems were running those polls and counties.
- 10/04/2012 05:19:14 AM
327 Views
they were not in 2004 and still had vote supression and irregularities
- 10/04/2012 04:44:36 PM
360 Views
I think you've got your facts wrong
- 10/04/2012 09:00:55 PM
366 Views
well, to be fair, it *has* been 8 years 
- 11/04/2012 03:49:17 AM
439 Views
- 11/04/2012 03:49:17 AM
439 Views
Fair Enough, my 'memory' is mostly google based on this anyway, from about a year ago and now
- 11/04/2012 04:00:57 AM
431 Views
Stating something doesn't make it true
- 10/04/2012 04:10:33 AM
402 Views
I'm impressed that you wrote so much in reply
- 10/04/2012 04:36:02 AM
373 Views
Then demonstrate that by having the courtesy to rebut it or withdraw your remarks
- 10/04/2012 06:30:52 AM
430 Views
How long voting takes is a function of machines, not voters.
- 10/04/2012 02:08:39 PM
443 Views
It's a function of various factors, that can certainly be one
- 10/04/2012 08:12:08 PM
400 Views
Ohio in 2004 was hinky enough to prompt the only Congressional challenge since 1876s Corrupt Bargain
- 10/04/2012 11:36:52 PM
539 Views
The fact that it's possible doesn't mean it's widespread, nor that every countermeasure is justified *NM*
- 10/04/2012 11:57:16 AM
157 Views
As long as people need not purchase their voting requirements, voter IDs are fine by me.
- 10/04/2012 12:53:35 PM
457 Views