Again, some people manifestly care; just not enough to relinquish a paid holiday.
Joel Send a noteboard - 28/05/2012 01:48:26 AM
No more than Christians taking pagan holidays and making up reasons for them having to do something with Jesus. We don't care, we just have a day off. They could change the name and date and "reason" and no one would care, as long as we got the day off.
Raising the question of why it merits a federal policy change in the first place. If it is not worth giving up ~3% of ones (paid) time, why is it worth an act of parliament?
And, of course, very religious but non-Christian Swedes (including thousands of immigrants) would care a great deal if they got a secular federal holiday rather than one devoted to what they consider a false religion.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
For Our Nordmenn: What Happens to Federal Religious Holidays in the Absence of a State Church?
- 27/05/2012 01:33:20 PM
1314 Views
Nothing, they are federal holidays still because of strong unions, not religion
- 27/05/2012 06:58:52 PM
735 Views
Hypocrisy FTW, eh? 
- 27/05/2012 11:04:38 PM
862 Views
- 27/05/2012 11:04:38 PM
862 Views
No.
- 27/05/2012 11:16:11 PM
687 Views
Again, some people manifestly care; just not enough to relinquish a paid holiday.
- 28/05/2012 01:48:26 AM
717 Views
Nothing.
- 27/05/2012 07:03:07 PM
676 Views
Replacing it with another, secular, holiday seems the responsible thing to do.
- 27/05/2012 11:15:11 PM
665 Views
People. Don't. Care.
- 27/05/2012 11:29:07 PM
700 Views
If people did not care, disestablishmentarianism (and its antithesis) would not exist.
- 28/05/2012 01:41:18 AM
859 Views
Most of them are stolen from heden traditions and have nothing to do with christianity.
- 27/05/2012 07:15:55 PM
988 Views
Since two resident history buffs recently excoriated me for that claim, I have no wish to revisit it
- 27/05/2012 11:27:13 PM
833 Views
Thanksgiving isn't a religious holiday.
- 27/05/2012 08:43:58 PM
759 Views
That is rather debatable.
- 28/05/2012 12:08:53 AM
852 Views
The Distinction
- 29/05/2012 07:41:47 PM
816 Views
Thanksgiving was a purely federal institution. FDR dictated the date it's celebrated
- 30/05/2012 03:22:09 AM
719 Views
That distinction would be an almost wholly Roman Catholic (or possibly Greek Orthodox) one.
- 01/06/2012 01:47:12 AM
686 Views
How do you come to four for Canada?
- 27/05/2012 11:29:57 PM
652 Views
Because I counted Thankgiving, and holidays for federal employees rather than just statutory ones.
- 28/05/2012 02:03:55 AM
820 Views
Re: Because I counted Thankgiving, and holidays for federal employees rather...
- 28/05/2012 04:31:14 AM
707 Views
Well, you know better than I, but I found the 1580s date interesting.
- 28/05/2012 04:08:31 PM
948 Views
Re: Well, you no better than I, but I found the 1580s date interesting.
- 29/05/2012 01:15:52 AM
765 Views
Ireland has a tonne of religious public holidays yet no state religion.
- 28/05/2012 12:48:55 AM
737 Views
I wondered how that would shake out for the rest of Europe, or at least Western Europe.
- 28/05/2012 02:29:16 AM
746 Views
It's funny how you use "federal" to mean "mandated by national government".
- 28/05/2012 03:49:17 PM
692 Views
I was thinking more "central" government, but OK.
- 28/05/2012 04:26:38 PM
719 Views
Re: I was thinking more "central" government, but OK.
- 28/05/2012 04:50:32 PM
670 Views
Re: I was thinking more "central" government, but OK.
- 01/06/2012 02:03:40 AM
897 Views
I think you've got the Scotland Act backwards.
- 01/06/2012 09:48:36 AM
847 Views
There's a lot of countries that call "devolution" federalism, though.
- 01/06/2012 09:52:23 PM
784 Views
What about when most of the country is still under central control?
- 02/06/2012 10:25:47 AM
693 Views