She claimed Palin putting crosshairs on her district could get her shot, a silly argument that really was meant as nothing more than red meat to get sheep lathered up, then completely unrelated to that she gets shot. Since there is zero evidence of link between the shooter and Palin and in fact he seems more of far left type then Gifford was wrong and Palin putting cross hairs on her district didn't get her shot regardless of the fact that she was shot for some completely different reason the original accusation still remains false. Something any rational person understand from the beginning but like I said it was aimed the irrational base of the left.