And I was not conned; there was no way I would have ever voted for McCain/Palin after that campaign. If that is my mistake because I judged them on the things they said to get elected that they wouldn't really have done, I believe at least some of that burden is on them.


A big tax? Or a 3.8% tax on the profit above $500,000 (250,000 single)? And unless it has been changed, it was supposed to be 2013.

I know you have issues with $250,000 being the threshold, and I don't disagree. However, IF I understand this correctly, one hast to be making $250,000 (couple) or $200,000 (single) before it is even an issue, and can exclude up to $500,000 in profits from a sale of a residence, so you would have to have made a fairly large profit to be paying more than, say, a grand. How many people can buy a house and then come back and sell it for much more than 500,000 in profit? I have to truly ask - am I far wrong? I am not in the 3% of people who have to worry about this, and I am not in the business of house-flipping, so I could be majorly missing something.


But we can also suspect that on the national stage (aka: not in a state that is referred to as socially progressive and liberal) there is only so much Romney will/can do to put his foot down if the house or senate tries to pass certain types of legislation. My one confidence with Obama is that if a certain type of bill comes up, I know he is less likely to be peer-pressured into making a decision I won't like (re: civil rights, foreign relations, etc), and maybe even more likely to be peer pressured into something I do support. Before you get all frothed, I am not claiming I always know what is "right." Just pointing out that we all have pet likes and dislikes, and I can't just ignore them, even though I am thinking more about the economy at the moment.


I need to research more than I have, but I haven't seen evidence that the current tax cuts have shown much growth. The exact same comment is true from the other angle - lowering taxes causes a different sort of tail-chase, and it will also never be enough. It seems to me that we need to spend more time focusing on where our taxes go than on raising or lowering them.


I do agree that that was a boneheaded comment, precisely because it ignores that risk. I don't think he was wrong though, regarding the other angle - it isn't fair to ignore the fact that if that girl couldn't get to school, the honor roll would be the least of her worries. *shrug* Yet again, we're back to a truth that's somewhere in the middle.


And I do respect your opinion. At the risk of giving you a larger ego (the horror!), I don't mind saying your comments on Obama definitely make me stop and think. And research. And read stuff I barely understand. And in general make my life hell. Thanks a lot.