Active Users:501 Time:19/09/2025 02:18:07 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Since when was Romney (or any Republican since TRs day) for more regulation or hiring more teachers? Joel Send a noteboard - 06/10/2012 01:33:53 PM
Either you have never understood Romney's position on these issues or you don't understand them now. I suspect both.

Show me some links were Romney's position on these issues has substantially changed. When was Romney against education or against all regulation? Sorry but over the top hyperbole does not really qualify as a rational argument.

I think Tom Tancredo had the best comment on Romneys debate performance:
“That’s where his comfort zone is. It seems apparent that he was, he wanted to talk about it because he feels comfortable with it,” Tancredo said. “I expected it, not surprised by it. I was for Santorum during the primaries for that reason. But now, who cares?”

Beating Obama, Tancredo said, is now more important than worrying about Romney’s positions.

Good point; who cares what President Romney actually does, as long as Obama loses? He could promise to hunt your kids for sport and still get your vote.

The sad thing is, if I actually thought for a second Romney believed half what he said on that Denver stage I could support him. The REALLY sad thing is millions of people who paid no attention while he promised the exact opposite for five years will. Romney cannot simultaneously repudiate the welfare state (as in his 47% video) AND embrace it (as he did Wednesday.) "Black is white and I love 'em both! :)" Whatever.... :rolleyes:

Here is a scary thought for you: What if he DOES mean it? What if, like Dems 30 years ago, todays GOP is sick of partisan extremists alienating voters and handing victory to inept opponents who expose their radicalism? If so, the GOP is headed for its own version of the Democratic Leadership Council, seeking election victory by sacrificing its fruits and their ideological integrity. Imagine a Republican Party doing to you what Democrats did to unions by endorsing the NAFTA and WTO. (8
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Just win, baby.
This message last edited by Joel on 06/10/2012 at 01:34:48 PM
Reply to message
Romney CRUSHES Obama in First Debate - Leads Swing States by 4% Anonymous2000 - 04/10/2012 05:32:32 AM 1132 Views
So, is that from a "corrected", "non-skewed" poll? Larry - 04/10/2012 05:51:58 AM 642 Views
Nope, I checked Betfair, the odds on Romney continue to drift Sports_Gambler - 04/10/2012 10:02:16 AM 733 Views
Wow, you suck at Googling! Anonymous2000 - 04/10/2012 01:14:22 PM 842 Views
Which poll at your link shows anything but Obama leading every swing state but NC? Joel - 04/10/2012 05:41:31 PM 755 Views
No, you just apparently suck at math Larry - 04/10/2012 07:17:20 PM 604 Views
I know you are sad, but your Messiah may still win.....you never know! Anonymous2000 - 04/10/2012 07:23:16 PM 673 Views
your mental instability and misperception of reality are worrisome -- please seek professional help moondog - 04/10/2012 07:54:45 PM 761 Views
Coming from you, that's a huge compliment! Thanks. *NM* Anonymous2000 - 04/10/2012 08:21:49 PM 482 Views
I'm more of a syndicalist, sorry Larry - 04/10/2012 08:43:48 PM 705 Views
Ooh, would you mind talking more about syndicalism? Burr - 04/10/2012 11:28:40 PM 612 Views
Sure, but I'm no doctrainaire on this Larry - 05/10/2012 01:13:19 AM 779 Views
Thank you! Reading the wikipedia entry was making my eyes glaze over. But I can try again now. *NM* Burr - 05/10/2012 02:14:50 PM 526 Views
It really should be mandatory for everyone to read factcheck.org after every debate. *NM* Nebhead - 04/10/2012 09:38:24 AM 374 Views
Seriously. The number of times I squinted and thought, "Wait, that doesn't sound quite right" beetnemesis - 04/10/2012 02:01:12 PM 736 Views
Romney addressed that head-on Tom - 04/10/2012 02:13:44 PM 638 Views
Yeah, that "20 million" comment raised my eyebrows. beetnemesis - 04/10/2012 04:15:49 PM 991 Views
Why are you not counting the elderly? Tom - 04/10/2012 07:33:28 PM 880 Views
Yeah, but it ain't, and it was Obamas job to make that unnecessary. Joel - 04/10/2012 03:26:50 PM 740 Views
Obama - Lost and Bewildered without Teleprompter.....funny stuff! Anonymous2000 - 04/10/2012 01:10:40 PM 662 Views
Which part of Romneys socialism was your favorite? Joel - 04/10/2012 03:38:17 PM 764 Views
I keep thinking that was what killed Obama. nossy - 04/10/2012 04:45:02 PM 682 Views
I suspected that was a lot of it, yeah, but he should have been prepared for the Etch-a-Sketch. Joel - 04/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 666 Views
living in a bubble where everyone agreed on those things and is what killed him random thoughts - 04/10/2012 05:59:29 PM 710 Views
why do you silly lefites keep acting like Romney is the first guy to move to the center? random thoughts - 04/10/2012 05:46:13 PM 873 Views
The primary was six months ago, and endorsing every aspect of limited welfare states is not centrist Joel - 04/10/2012 06:00:56 PM 695 Views
can you support that insane argument? *NM* random thoughts - 05/10/2012 01:10:11 PM 253 Views
Romney explicitly endorsed regulations, soaking the rich, entitlements and public education funding. Joel - 05/10/2012 02:25:49 PM 712 Views
you could have just said no random thoughts - 05/10/2012 05:25:44 PM 673 Views
Since when was Romney (or any Republican since TRs day) for more regulation or hiring more teachers? Joel - 06/10/2012 01:33:53 PM 745 Views
Well Bush was pushing for more banking regulations but Barney Franks blocked him random thoughts - 07/10/2012 03:52:50 PM 834 Views
A2000, your message should read: heartbreak - 04/10/2012 03:42:18 PM 684 Views
I consider the margin of error implied. Joel - 04/10/2012 05:49:50 PM 586 Views
Unfortunately statistics does not support that. heartbreak - 04/10/2012 06:11:56 PM 700 Views
Of course they do; the law of averages supports that. Joel - 04/10/2012 06:46:27 PM 731 Views
Poll numbers aren't random so even if the law of averages could be applied to a small data set... heartbreak - 04/10/2012 07:05:49 PM 611 Views
If not random, they are indicative (if not necessary conclusive,) and the data set is large enough. Joel - 04/10/2012 08:55:24 PM 598 Views
Let me rephrase: the law of averages is a belief. You are basing your conclusion on a belief. heartbreak - 04/10/2012 09:23:50 PM 673 Views
I have never used the Law of Averages to mean anything except the (proven) Law of Large Numbers. Joel - 05/10/2012 09:22:56 AM 786 Views
I'm pretty sure that 136 is not a large number. *NM* heartbreak - 05/10/2012 12:20:35 PM 399 Views
That is a matter of opinion, but for a binary event I think it huge. Joel - 05/10/2012 12:42:24 PM 710 Views
Without additional data, the default would be that the coin is fair. Since... heartbreak - 05/10/2012 05:20:21 PM 640 Views
After 136 trials the DEFAULT assumption no longer applies in the face of ample hard data. Joel - 06/10/2012 04:02:51 PM 767 Views
I did the same experiment I suggested for you. heartbreak - 06/10/2012 04:45:28 PM 613 Views
Still not a 3:1 ratio. Joel - 06/10/2012 06:09:00 PM 848 Views
Let me try and put it a slightly different way. heartbreak - 06/10/2012 08:12:35 PM 717 Views
The more lopsided/large the trial, the more LIKELY the coin is unfair;weight is the only way to KNOW Joel - 07/10/2012 12:09:27 PM 862 Views
You're completely missing the point. heartbreak - 07/10/2012 03:34:29 PM 714 Views
But 100 polls isn't analogous to 100 coin flips. Each of thousands of individuals is a coin flip. Burr - 07/10/2012 11:05:13 PM 698 Views
that is why you can't base things on just one poll random thoughts - 05/10/2012 01:27:18 AM 794 Views
You are making the same mistake Joel is making. You should read our discussion. *NM* heartbreak - 05/10/2012 01:50:01 AM 454 Views
there is a difference between statistical errors and model or method errors random thoughts - 05/10/2012 03:28:38 AM 671 Views
There is a difference between the law of averages and the law of large numbers. heartbreak - 05/10/2012 04:45:00 AM 867 Views
you left out part of that wiki quote you pasted random thoughts - 05/10/2012 05:30:52 AM 810 Views
You still haven't justified the application of the law of large numbers. heartbreak - 05/10/2012 12:24:51 PM 565 Views
I suggest you take some time to understand what I wrote and get back to me random thoughts - 05/10/2012 01:12:03 PM 596 Views
I obviously must have missed where you justified the use of the law of large numbers. heartbreak - 05/10/2012 04:43:51 PM 647 Views
WellI did that twice and I am waiting for you to refute what I said *NM* random thoughts - 05/10/2012 05:28:18 PM 435 Views
Since you are unwilling to be helpful... heartbreak - 05/10/2012 05:50:47 PM 755 Views
The law is a trend throughout, not a pass/fail based on if the number of polls is "large enough" Burr - 06/10/2012 03:26:33 PM 742 Views
I'm not saying that the law of large numbers doesn't make the margin of error less when... heartbreak - 06/10/2012 04:55:16 PM 622 Views
decades of polling history say you are wrong random thoughts - 07/10/2012 04:08:45 PM 907 Views
Stating that, "decades of polling history say you are wrong" doesn't prove your point. heartbreak - 07/10/2012 05:35:57 PM 590 Views
you are either ignoring what I am saying or you are mentally unable to understand it so I am done random thoughts - 07/10/2012 06:11:22 PM 549 Views
As you wish. I'm starting to get the same feeling from you as well. So whatever. But before you go.. heartbreak - 07/10/2012 07:20:17 PM 699 Views
can wait for Ryan vs Bozo the VP random thoughts - 04/10/2012 06:07:30 PM 556 Views
+1 - that debate is going to be comical! Anonymous2000 - 04/10/2012 07:24:26 PM 670 Views
I would end up with alchohol posioning *NM* random thoughts - 04/10/2012 10:16:51 PM 404 Views
If Biden performs as expected... Tom - 04/10/2012 07:46:16 PM 701 Views
your take on obama's foreign policy debate performance does not seem like reality moondog - 04/10/2012 08:00:51 PM 643 Views
I never would have thought Romney could lay such a beatdown on Obama as I saw last night. Narg - 04/10/2012 08:55:46 PM 714 Views
we saw the anti-romney last night. i doubt obama is going to be so flat-footed against him next time moondog - 04/10/2012 10:35:21 PM 643 Views
Hilarious. Narg - 04/10/2012 11:20:32 PM 597 Views
Re: Hilarious. moondog - 05/10/2012 12:27:33 AM 604 Views
Why can it not be both? Joel - 05/10/2012 12:58:59 PM 743 Views
by that you mean he isn't the Romney the left tried to pretend he was and now they are mad random thoughts - 05/10/2012 12:53:00 AM 752 Views
right.... that whole 47% thing is a totally moderate position for a politician to take... *NM* moondog - 05/10/2012 04:32:25 AM 361 Views
about as moderate as thinking the government didn't help New Orleans because it has a lot of blacks random thoughts - 05/10/2012 04:51:15 AM 665 Views
if you only have obama's comments from LAST election in 2008 then you have nothing moondog - 05/10/2012 03:38:07 PM 599 Views
who would you consider our number one geopolitical foe? random thoughts - 04/10/2012 10:12:53 PM 722 Views
China is far more dangerous. *NM* Ghavrel - 05/10/2012 07:23:06 AM 309 Views
Whoa, was not expecting that point of agreement. Joel - 05/10/2012 12:35:35 PM 751 Views
I'm not frightened of them, but they're hardly an ally. *NM* Ghavrel - 05/10/2012 03:55:45 PM 411 Views
I am not frightened, but am concerned. Joel - 06/10/2012 01:27:40 PM 723 Views
they may be more dangerous but that doesn't that doesn't automatically make them first random thoughts - 05/10/2012 01:09:30 PM 723 Views
name two foreign policy decisions russia has blocked since 2008 *NM* moondog - 05/10/2012 03:41:15 PM 343 Views
That's fair enough. *NM* Ghavrel - 05/10/2012 03:54:56 PM 359 Views
It's generally both of them, really, isn't it? Legolas - 05/10/2012 10:03:39 PM 596 Views
Agreed; much of it is that both China and Russia profit handsomely from nuclear proliferation. Joel - 06/10/2012 01:55:21 PM 724 Views
They both block us in the Middle East but Russia blocks us in Europe o a much larger degree random thoughts - 07/10/2012 04:22:40 PM 652 Views
WOW - Even the liberal CNN Poll confirms Romney's crushing victory. Anonymous2000 - 04/10/2012 07:27:28 PM 752 Views
I could have crushed either of them in that debate TheCrownless - 04/10/2012 09:26:07 PM 734 Views
I watched it now. A few thoughts (albeit rather late): Legolas - 05/10/2012 09:46:02 PM 792 Views
You are correct on all points. Avendesora - 07/10/2012 03:12:51 AM 893 Views
"There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe." Joel - 07/10/2012 02:03:49 PM 1175 Views
you are missing a key point random thoughts - 07/10/2012 04:34:17 PM 691 Views
Am I missing that point? I thought I said clearly enough that I thought Romney was better. *NM* Legolas - 07/10/2012 08:47:42 PM 421 Views
maybe, seemed that way to me random thoughts - 08/10/2012 03:18:18 PM 670 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes