Wrong. I am talking about labels and what they are used for.
Narg Send a noteboard - 16/10/2012 10:42:11 PM
Those for the traditional definition of marriage are too often painted as "hate filled" or driven by hate. People use those types of labels to dehumanize their opponents.
Rather than just saying their faith-influenced political positions are stupid, wrong, uninformed, etc., bad intentions must also be assigned. Hence they are labeled as hate filled bigots. The word "hate" is almost always used by proponents of gay marriage to describe the motivation of those who oppose it. They are hate filled, their agenda is hate based, etc. These are the dehumanizing labels used so that you are no longer just opposing other humans with a very different view-point, but monsters driven by their unbridled hatred. Or in some cases, the attributes of the very worst of your opponents are given to all of your opponents, even if the vast majority are not in fact "filled with hate" or "driven by hate".
Rather than just saying their faith-influenced political positions are stupid, wrong, uninformed, etc., bad intentions must also be assigned. Hence they are labeled as hate filled bigots. The word "hate" is almost always used by proponents of gay marriage to describe the motivation of those who oppose it. They are hate filled, their agenda is hate based, etc. These are the dehumanizing labels used so that you are no longer just opposing other humans with a very different view-point, but monsters driven by their unbridled hatred. Or in some cases, the attributes of the very worst of your opponents are given to all of your opponents, even if the vast majority are not in fact "filled with hate" or "driven by hate".
A little learning is a dangerous thing.
A Bible belt conservative spent a year pretending to be gay
14/10/2012 12:25:34 PM
- 821 Views
OK, I thought that was cool. Put his money where his mouth is, so to speak. *NM*
14/10/2012 12:37:55 PM
- 158 Views
Plenty of the comments are really disheartening
14/10/2012 07:23:42 PM
- 406 Views
There was one that I thought pretty good:
15/10/2012 10:57:42 PM
- 320 Views
I have to agree with that one. Most people come out in order to be more honest with their family.
16/10/2012 02:39:46 AM
- 360 Views
"The vast majority of conservative Christians are not hateful bigots at all."
15/10/2012 10:55:34 PM
- 366 Views
He does say his mother came around in the end.
15/10/2012 10:57:50 PM
- 310 Views
Maybe most conservative christians...
15/10/2012 11:44:13 PM
- 353 Views
Sorry, that is just an attempted role-reversal; objecting to hatred is not the "real hatred."
16/10/2012 01:26:39 AM
- 315 Views
In addition, the bible doesn't forbid it. The bible is not a monolithic work, but an anthology.
16/10/2012 02:32:59 AM
- 439 Views
What I said is correct.
16/10/2012 05:49:13 PM
- 298 Views
Dude, the "You're intolerant of intolerance!" argument is so played out
16/10/2012 08:34:35 PM
- 557 Views
I think he has a good point. It just shouldn't be generalized so far as he is doing.
16/10/2012 09:23:13 PM
- 319 Views
Wrong. I am talking about labels and what they are used for.
16/10/2012 10:42:11 PM
- 372 Views
And on the other hand, various "logical justifications" tend to boil down to one thing:
16/10/2012 11:01:50 PM
- 307 Views
I actually DO believe that anti-gay-marriage people eat babies ;-) *NM*
16/10/2012 11:32:35 PM
- 177 Views
We use "bigot" like Christians use "sinner."
16/10/2012 09:12:39 PM
- 382 Views
You can't just assume someone has the motivation you want them to have.
16/10/2012 11:08:09 PM
- 309 Views
For me it is as simple as looking into my own heart, several years back.
17/10/2012 04:51:13 AM
- 283 Views