Active Users:628 Time:03/08/2025 10:16:56 AM
Re: I've also got a question for you Isaac Send a noteboard - 11/11/2012 04:51:55 PM
We all know what happened this time perfectly well, we relied on a lot of Obama's people not showing from 2008 and more of ours showing, as best as I can tell, in Ohio anyway, we actually ran a better ground game too, his worked in the end, ours didn't, in all probability it was just took less effort per voter for them then for us and they had a bigger pool.

Am I misunderstanding this? All the comments from before and after the election, from Ohio and nationally, were about how massively the Obama campaign was outperforming Romney in the efforts to get their voters out - knocking on far more doors and talking to far more people on the phone. Given the election result wasn't a landslide in voter numbers, that suggests to me that the Obama campaign had to work far harder for the votes it got.

Or is that not how you meant that


No, the newsies can report stuff but the campaigns actually track their voter contact, to the best of my knowledge - and I could be wrong about theirs but I know ours for Ohio - we had more of it, and certainly my specific area did and I can go into that in detail if you like but preferably by NB.

Concept here being that X and Y might go out and bang on some targeted doors, say X hits 20 and Y hits 15, in theory X gets more voters but in practice it may be that Y had an easier time of it. As an example, it's probably easier to convince 15 slightly apathetic Obama voters from 2008 to vote again and for him then it is to convince 20 Ron Paul supporters to vote for Romney. This could go either way with different targets but that looks to be what happened overall.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
What next for Romney and the Republican party? - 07/11/2012 03:51:50 PM 1028 Views
In my view, more moderation is needed. - 07/11/2012 04:17:05 PM 560 Views
Libertarian is the way to go IMO. - 07/11/2012 05:19:29 PM 506 Views
Not yet. - 07/11/2012 06:55:19 PM 662 Views
I am no expert, but I think Romney is done. - 07/11/2012 07:00:33 PM 632 Views
I'd say they're pretty much done - 07/11/2012 07:54:44 PM 520 Views
I'm not sure about that. - 07/11/2012 08:04:33 PM 650 Views
Again, the numbers you cited will continue to shrink every year. - 07/11/2012 08:25:21 PM 1106 Views
Well Romney is retiring but no the GOP is hardly 'done' - 08/11/2012 12:51:44 AM 488 Views
I do hope the Republican party have the same lax attitude, I love seeing them lose *NM* - 08/11/2012 12:46:32 PM 241 Views
I imagine lots of idiots feel the same way on both sides about both parties *NM* - 08/11/2012 11:05:29 PM 264 Views
If you're relying on the democrats crashing and burning - 09/11/2012 02:45:41 PM 545 Views
the dems played the "wait for the repubs to crash and burn" strategy and it worked out ok this year - 09/11/2012 05:01:53 PM 598 Views
Off topic, but is your Shift key broken? - 09/11/2012 05:47:12 PM 502 Views
I don't think I've ever seen him use capitalization. *NM* - 09/11/2012 07:00:26 PM 404 Views
do you have similar problems when talking to people with weird hair color or clothes IRL? - 09/11/2012 07:09:24 PM 474 Views
I think he was asking why you do it *NM* - 09/11/2012 07:15:27 PM 245 Views
The Dems learned their lesson from the Gore campaign - 09/11/2012 06:25:23 PM 583 Views
i beg to differ - 09/11/2012 07:22:40 PM 448 Views
The facts speak for themselves - 09/11/2012 07:46:20 PM 617 Views
Re: The facts speak for themselves - 11/11/2012 01:13:05 AM 573 Views
I've also got a question for you - 11/11/2012 02:16:07 PM 476 Views
Re: I've also got a question for you - 11/11/2012 04:51:55 PM 522 Views
Re: I've also got a question for you - 11/11/2012 05:48:52 PM 622 Views
I think you were taking that statement rather literally - 11/11/2012 07:36:14 PM 527 Views
Oh, I can absolutely count on them crahsing and burning, that's a given, happens to both regularly *NM* - 09/11/2012 06:28:51 PM 285 Views
You can't count on exploiting that - 09/11/2012 06:39:47 PM 635 Views
'Mistakes' is subjective, sometimes you have to play your hand - 11/11/2012 01:09:31 AM 508 Views
i think you've hit on a major point here - 11/11/2012 02:08:50 PM 557 Views
It's a matter of perspective - 11/11/2012 05:19:13 PM 666 Views
how are 300+ EVs "the skin of his teeth"? - 08/11/2012 05:46:51 PM 517 Views
Because he barely won them? *NM* - 08/11/2012 11:06:14 PM 227 Views
only OH, NC and FL are within 2% margin, i'd hardly call that "barely won" - 08/11/2012 11:25:54 PM 530 Views
Which is less than Bush 2, Clinton, Reagan, or Nixon? - 09/11/2012 12:26:51 AM 487 Views
i never claimed a death knell for the GOP - 09/11/2012 12:32:00 AM 573 Views
What makes you think Hillary won't be running? - 08/11/2012 06:07:38 PM 492 Views
I won't totally rule it out but I don't see it in the cards - 08/11/2012 11:08:12 PM 489 Views

Reply to Message