Active Users:226 Time:17/05/2024 02:27:52 AM
Well, I guess to expedite the process of argument and counter-argument, I'll post an article an Stephen Send a noteboard - 14/11/2012 07:28:01 PM
article and not a blog post.

Woman 'denied a termination' dies in hospital

KITTY HOLLAND and PAUL CULLEN, Health Correspondent

Two investigations are under way into the death of a woman who was 17 weeks pregnant, at University Hospital Galway last month.

Savita Halappanavar (31), a dentist, presented with back pain at the hospital on October 21st, was found to be miscarrying, and died of septicaemia a week later.

Her husband, Praveen Halappanavar (34), an engineer at Boston Scientific in Galway, says she asked several times over a three-day period that the pregnancy be terminated. He says that, having been told she was miscarrying, and after one day in severe pain, Ms Halappanavar asked for a medical termination.

This was refused, he says, because the foetal heartbeat was still present and they were told, “this is a Catholic country”.

She spent a further 2½ days “in agony” until the foetal heartbeat stopped.

Intensive care

The dead foetus was removed and Savita was taken to the high dependency unit and then the intensive care unit, where she died of septicaemia on the 28th.

An autopsy carried out by Dr Grace Callagy two days later found she died of septicaemia “documented ante-mortem” and E.coli ESBL.

A hospital spokesman confirmed the Health Service Executive had begun an investigation while the hospital had also instigated an internal investigation. He said the hospital extended its sympathy to the family and friends of Ms Halappanavar but could not discuss the details of any individual case.

Speaking from Belgaum in the Karnataka region of southwest India, Mr Halappanavar said an internal examination was performed when she first presented.

“The doctor told us the cervix was fully dilated, amniotic fluid was leaking and unfortunately the baby wouldn’t survive.” The doctor, he says, said it should be over in a few hours. There followed three days, he says, of the foetal heartbeat being checked several times a day.

“Savita was really in agony. She was very upset, but she accepted she was losing the baby. When the consultant came on the ward rounds on Monday morning Savita asked if they could not save the baby could they induce to end the pregnancy. The consultant said, ‘As long as there is a foetal heartbeat we can’t do anything’.

“Again on Tuesday morning, the ward rounds and the same discussion. The consultant said it was the law, that this is a Catholic country. Savita [a Hindu] said: ‘I am neither Irish nor Catholic’ but they said there was nothing they could do.

“That evening she developed shakes and shivering and she was vomiting. She went to use the toilet and she collapsed. There were big alarms and a doctor took bloods and started her on antibiotics.

“The next morning I said she was so sick and asked again that they just end it, but they said they couldn’t.”

Critically ill

At lunchtime the foetal heart had stopped and Ms Halappanavar was brought to theatre to have the womb contents removed. “When she came out she was talking okay but she was very sick. That’s the last time I spoke to her.”

At 11 pm he got a call from the hospital. “They said they were shifting her to intensive care. Her heart and pulse were low, her temperature was high. She was sedated and critical but stable. She stayed stable on Friday but by 7pm on Saturday they said her heart, kidneys and liver weren’t functioning. She was critically ill. That night, we lost her.”

Mr Halappanavar took his wife’s body home on Thursday, November 1st, where she was cremated and laid to rest on November 3rd.

The hospital spokesman said that in general sudden hospital deaths were reported to the coroner. In the case of maternal deaths, a risk review of the case was carried out.

External experts were involved in this review and the family consulted on the terms of reference. They were also interviewed by the review team and given a copy of the report.


As for my opinions, this is terrible. Twenty years ago the High Court said that the government was required to legislate for cases of abortion where it was medically necessary. This never happened and yet here we are in 2012 and a woman has denied because she was denied necessary, life-saving treatment. All the doctors and medical staff who refused treatment should be arrested and imprisoned for murder.

This was nothing but murder. By carrying out an abortion, the doctors would not have been terminating a viable foetus. Savita Halavanappar was having a miscarriage, and by refusing to treat her and expidite the process they caused not only the foetus but also the lady to perish. This goes against all morality and legality. Fuck these doctors, fuck this hospital and fuck this country that lets a woman die due to antiquated notions of morality.
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Reply to message
woman dies after doctors deny her a life-saving abortion - 14/11/2012 06:58:31 PM 1250 Views
this is so terribly sad. keeping abortions legal is important. *NM* - 14/11/2012 07:09:00 PM 224 Views
Well, I guess to expedite the process of argument and counter-argument, I'll post an article an - 14/11/2012 07:28:01 PM 528 Views
Maybe this is more a testament to the quality of care in that hospital than an arguemnt for abortion *NM* - 15/11/2012 01:49:00 PM 239 Views
Can you elaborate? - 16/11/2012 04:07:48 PM 452 Views
Do you have access to her medical charts? - 16/11/2012 08:44:45 PM 457 Views
Statistically speaking... - 15/11/2012 07:03:51 PM 474 Views
Where did you get your statistics from? - 15/11/2012 09:19:29 PM 707 Views
Psst. - 15/11/2012 09:43:35 PM 516 Views
I'm pretty sure his 0.3% figure comes from - 15/11/2012 10:01:29 PM 430 Views
That would certainly change the difference between the numbers. - 15/11/2012 10:07:42 PM 498 Views
Re: Statistically speaking... - 15/11/2012 10:56:35 PM 469 Views
Where's the due process? - 15/11/2012 11:35:39 PM 544 Views
First, prove that the fetus is a "ONE". - 16/11/2012 04:14:34 PM 418 Views
That argument is specious - 16/11/2012 08:36:07 PM 435 Views
But you cannot call another living person an "environment." Only for parasites. - 16/11/2012 10:16:18 PM 408 Views
Yes I can, look up the word environment - 17/11/2012 11:49:55 AM 538 Views
No, I do not accept the risk of pregnancy. - 20/11/2012 01:41:07 PM 414 Views
Re: No, I do not accept the risk of pregnancy. - 20/11/2012 03:59:19 PM 423 Views
well said - 20/11/2012 05:27:11 PM 522 Views
I agree, but it does not matter. - 16/11/2012 08:26:17 PM 421 Views
Win some, lose some - 15/11/2012 11:29:32 PM 577 Views
In other words, if you don't want to die, become a lesbian. *NM* - 16/11/2012 04:16:23 PM 237 Views
stop calling women whores - 16/11/2012 04:55:49 PM 506 Views

Reply to Message