Active Users:1488 Time:12/09/2026 12:13:44 PM
As a United Statesian, that bothers me a bit as well. Joel Send a noteboard - 24/11/2012 01:45:54 PM
But very few Scots will let you away with calling them English. It's similar to how Canadians get annoyed when people mistake them for Americans.


Actually, we don't mind so much been called Americans or at least North Americans (no more than German or French mind much being referred to as Europeans). Well, franco-canadians from Québec don't give a damn about this anyway as our sense of cultural identity is as strong as the Americans' and we don't mind the association to the USA, but I do know some anglo-canadians who do get more irritated than us when called Americans - as to them it's perceived more as making nothing of the differences between their culture and the American one.

What a lot of Canadians and South-Americans mind a bit is that the term American became widely used in reference to citizens of the USA when it was the only country on the continent (the rest were colonies) and it never got changed when this no longer reflected reality and it became usual to refer to continental groups in geopolitics.

And thus you end up with people oddly minding to be called by their continent's name when it's proper to do it, and modern historians and some of the more "serious" media insisting to refer to Americans as "États-Uniens" (I don't know that an usual English alternative name for American beside "US citizen" exists - never heard it if it does - this may well be a Québec + South American thing only. French has another alternative way around it, as rather than use Americans/North-South-Americans in the continental context, we use an expression that in English would be "the people of the Americas" - weird sounding in English but not in French).

Since, of course, the term "American" properly refers to any and all residents of two entire continents. Unfortunately, there is no convenient demonym appropriate for US citizens. The UK actually does offer a good parallel here, since its demonym is usually "British" just as our is "American," even though both terms technically encompass far more territory (and thus people) than just the nations they are respectively understood to indicate. Referring to "United Kingdomers" and "United Staters" would just be awkward.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So, I found this video explaining the differences between The UK, Great Britain, England, etc. - 19/11/2012 07:18:13 PM 1368 Views
Great Britain is an island containing England, Scotland and Wales. - 19/11/2012 08:07:35 PM 931 Views
Is that why Andy Murray is getting credit for being British? *NM* - 19/11/2012 08:46:45 PM 540 Views
Ideally, yes; most likely, no. - 19/11/2012 08:55:22 PM 913 Views
They keep saying "the first British man to win a Grand Slam title since 1938" - 19/11/2012 10:12:44 PM 914 Views
Mostly that's an indication of just how desperate they were before that happened. - 19/11/2012 10:30:40 PM 890 Views
Plus he is British - 19/11/2012 10:49:38 PM 913 Views
I do believe I said so in my post, yes. - 19/11/2012 11:00:05 PM 931 Views
Barely so, I would say. - 19/11/2012 11:14:08 PM 915 Views
But Scotland is a different country than England, yes? - 20/11/2012 12:34:07 AM 926 Views
The UK is one country, technically. - 20/11/2012 10:57:03 AM 876 Views
Yes and no. Mostly no. - 20/11/2012 10:59:10 AM 925 Views
Because country is a difficult term. - 20/11/2012 02:20:42 PM 957 Views
Only because the UK makes it one - 20/11/2012 09:47:28 PM 860 Views
So would you say - 20/11/2012 04:21:36 PM 777 Views
I am about as Anglophile as they come, as I dare say you may have noticed... - 20/11/2012 07:35:36 PM 776 Views
Yes - 20/11/2012 09:35:54 PM 937 Views
Now you just had to go and remind me... - 20/11/2012 09:49:41 PM 956 Views
I'm speechless. - 20/11/2012 10:08:53 PM 957 Views
What does it say about Belgium... - 20/11/2012 10:21:54 PM 888 Views
Something good, I'm sure? - 22/11/2012 12:13:06 AM 954 Views
I find that hard to believe. - 21/11/2012 04:08:51 PM 884 Views
Can I be a pedant for a minute? - 20/11/2012 11:02:48 AM 1010 Views
you can - 20/11/2012 01:07:39 PM 911 Views
Re: you can - 20/11/2012 05:11:04 PM 938 Views
Well, it IS true. - 20/11/2012 08:12:13 PM 922 Views
The Andy Murray issue that riles us Scots is.... - 21/11/2012 03:57:44 PM 904 Views
As a Kiwi import to Scotland, that's always amused me. - 21/11/2012 04:33:34 PM 848 Views
I thought we all knew that wasn't true by now? - 21/11/2012 10:49:04 PM 896 Views
If you can call it credit *NM* - 20/11/2012 04:42:10 PM 520 Views
*NM* - 20/11/2012 06:24:35 PM 486 Views
Well, yes. But the reason I put this up... - 19/11/2012 09:43:53 PM 872 Views
Not all Scots dislike being called British. Only the Nationalist ones. - 20/11/2012 07:34:32 PM 920 Views
Well, that is more reasonable then. - 20/11/2012 08:07:18 PM 931 Views
Uh, what? - 20/11/2012 08:55:12 PM 820 Views
Oh dear, you had to ask *NM* - 20/11/2012 08:58:52 PM 483 Views
Haven't you seen Braveheart? *NM* - 20/11/2012 09:12:21 PM 515 Views
Independence from England. - 24/11/2012 01:37:11 PM 987 Views
The point I'm guessing Rebekah is referring to, and it's a fairly important one... - 28/11/2012 07:20:11 PM 856 Views
I'm not sure they really work at all - 28/11/2012 10:50:54 PM 882 Views
And over here. - 29/11/2012 01:36:01 AM 802 Views
Re: Not all Scots dislike being called British. Only the Nationalist ones. - 21/11/2012 12:58:26 AM 895 Views
As a United Statesian, that bothers me a bit as well. - 24/11/2012 01:45:54 PM 945 Views

Reply to Message