Active Users:136 Time:20/05/2024 03:35:09 PM
Ah wookiepedia, my third favorite wiki to waste hours on Isaac Send a noteboard - 06/12/2012 12:32:50 PM
That's about a fifth of an acre. And seeing as its not a perfect rectangle means it's smaller than that. I guess its closer to 0.15 acres.

I wonder what they'll do with all that extra space.


Parking lots, tourist traps, other exhibits of SW or other totems of geekdom and so on I suppose, 88 acres isn't likely to cost as much as the model itself in Tennessee unless it's within spitting distance of a bigger city.

Pity though, I could see myself donating cash to something as truly over-the-top as an actually 88 acre Millennium Falcon
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 06/12/2012 at 12:34:19 PM
Reply to message
Seems a good use of 88 acres of land - 06/12/2012 10:46:14 AM 499 Views
I'm guessing the model won't actually take up 88 acres itself - 06/12/2012 11:54:30 AM 327 Views
The Star Wars wiki says it is 34.37 x 25.61 meters at it's widest dimensions. - 06/12/2012 12:25:25 PM 330 Views
Ah wookiepedia, my third favorite wiki to waste hours on - 06/12/2012 12:32:50 PM 271 Views
starwars.wikia.com actually. - 06/12/2012 12:38:38 PM 499 Views
They better lawyer up as soon as possible - 06/12/2012 06:05:13 PM 254 Views
Re: They better lawyer up as soon as possible - 06/12/2012 06:10:20 PM 296 Views
Well no. - 06/12/2012 12:40:11 PM 297 Views
the other 87 acres are for parking and hotels *NM* - 06/12/2012 06:08:19 PM 113 Views
omg yes! - 06/12/2012 05:25:04 PM 276 Views
Sounds like you need a holiday in Tennessee *NM* - 06/12/2012 06:14:14 PM 142 Views
Tennesseeing is Tennebelieving! *NM* - 06/12/2012 06:47:07 PM 131 Views
Wow, that dude is single?! Shocking.... - 06/12/2012 10:51:07 PM 420 Views
Hehe, awesome. *NM* - 06/12/2012 10:57:26 PM 113 Views

Reply to Message