Active Users:718 Time:14/10/2025 07:44:27 AM
actually..... moondog Send a noteboard - 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM
SCOTUS ruled that Florida had to follow their own laws, that existed at the time of the election, not change them on the fly.


they ruled that florida should do a full recount, but that doing a full recount would harm the winner (bush), and they took their time to decide the case such that FL did not have time to do the full recount by the date the results needed to be certified.

it's still beside the fact that the FL supreme court should have been the deciding factor in the case, but now that it's history there is no point in arguing it anymore...
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia is brilliant, just brilliant - - 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM 1157 Views
WTF does "I don’t care what their intent was. I care what it was that they intended" mean? - 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM 693 Views
Yeah I read that twice to see if that was right *NM* - 11/12/2012 09:36:55 PM 311 Views
Part of me pities Scalias decline, because he could once nimbly and convincly argue black is white. - 12/12/2012 07:09:56 PM 664 Views
Re: your post. - 12/12/2012 07:18:18 PM 620 Views
You are quite right; I never noticed that until now. - 12/12/2012 07:29:08 PM 726 Views
Not quite - 12/12/2012 08:16:27 PM 738 Views
Poes Law. - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM 646 Views
More like disapeared in a puff of Florida's own law that they were trying to ignore. - 12/12/2012 08:13:13 PM 643 Views
actually..... - 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM 728 Views
Re: actually..... - 12/12/2012 09:39:01 PM 648 Views
Your whole rant lacks any logic - 12/12/2012 03:46:34 PM 686 Views
+1 - logic is not his strong suit. *NM* - 12/12/2012 04:21:09 PM 270 Views
His comment references the authors (NOT words) intent in both negative and affirmative. - 12/12/2012 06:45:02 PM 643 Views
Rebuttal - 12/12/2012 07:58:41 PM 678 Views
Only nominally. - 16/12/2012 03:54:38 PM 653 Views
I was stumped by his phrasing as well - 12/12/2012 09:31:53 PM 555 Views
The SCotUS is no place for raging homophobes. - 13/12/2012 04:48:30 AM 790 Views
Sorry you don't like it, but what he said is true. - 13/12/2012 03:11:42 PM 695 Views
Lol. Homophobia is synonymous w/ homonegativism. It's not meant to convey a true phobia *NM* - 13/12/2012 03:28:01 PM 384 Views
So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 09:56:15 PM 722 Views
Re: So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 11:16:46 PM 664 Views
-phobe : Greek -phobos, adj. derivative of phóbos fear, panic - 13/12/2012 11:32:14 PM 686 Views
Do you have a similar problem with "xenophobia?" Because it's exactly the same thing. - 14/12/2012 01:30:24 AM 623 Views
xenophobia is the fear of the alien... WTF are you trying to say? - 14/12/2012 03:03:09 AM 684 Views
No. You are patently, objectively incorrect. - 14/12/2012 08:39:00 AM 602 Views
An aside. - 14/12/2012 01:21:32 PM 686 Views
Don't believe me, ask a Greek it is after all THEIR word. I gave you some extra capitals, happy now? *NM* - 14/12/2012 02:56:09 PM 382 Views
stop being obtuse - 14/12/2012 05:10:41 PM 657 Views
Hmmmm lets see, people misuse a word, perverting its meaning... - 14/12/2012 07:29:11 PM 626 Views
Double post. *NM* - 14/12/2012 10:14:50 PM 288 Views
that's glory for you! - 14/12/2012 10:44:30 PM 694 Views
So very conflicted, in so many ways.... - 16/12/2012 04:14:08 PM 793 Views

Reply to Message