Public or private.
Because either way, the system does need work.
Because either way, the system does need work.
I think the health insurance industry is being unfairly pinned as the bad guy in this whole situation though. I think the real roots of our country's health care problems tend to come from several sources.
One, the people: The frivolous law suits for malpractice and other types of tort are a major drain on the health care system and result in dramatically higher health care costs across the board. Between the cost of malpractice insurance, and the amount of money spent on settlements in the various lawsuits against the health care industry, it becomes nearly impossible for them to charge any less than they currently do for health care.
Two, pharmaceutical companies. The absurd amounts of money that they are permitted to charge for their drugs is crippling to insurance companies and people alike. This issue is one that is much more difficult to solve in my mind, because in all honesty many of the advances made in health care are made by these companies, and they are able to make these advances because they make so much money off of their overpriced pills. Cut their profits on the prescriptions, and you cut how much money they have to spend on research, and eventually slow down the pace of innovation in the health care industry. I think more oversight in the industry, a shorter period of exclusivity on the drugs, and control of advertising could help dramatically, but may not be enough.
I won't say that the insurance companies are without fault, and that they don't participate in some unsavory practices. What I will say about that though, is that the oversight in that industry is considerably more strict than it is for pharmaceutical companies, or lawsuits. Much of what they do is forced upon them by the incredibly high prices of health care. If costs were controlled more effectively, then cost of insurance, and the numbers of people that the companies are able to extend coverage to would dramatically increase. The way the system works right now, the companies are forced to be extremely exclusionary in their practices just to make sure they are able to make a profit. Their profit margins are too slim to be able to extend coverage to more people than they already do. Fix the other problems, and provide a little more oversight to the insurance industry, and I think that the entire health care situation will dramatically improve.
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan
- 29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
900 Views
- 29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
900 Views
I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts
- 29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM
618 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped.....
- 29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM
627 Views
Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased
- 29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
721 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
- 29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM
624 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
- 29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM
798 Views
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
- 29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM
563 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
- 29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM
683 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
- 29/09/2009 11:40:42 PM
723 Views
his statements on health care are precisely my point, but much more well stated. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 11:54:29 PM
268 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
- 29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM
673 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
- 30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM
658 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM*
- 30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM
261 Views
That's indisbutable
- 30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM
654 Views
It doesn't work at all
- 30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM
689 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care
- 30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM
703 Views
When the malpractice insurance can cost well over $100k a year of course it effects the costs.
- 30/09/2009 06:21:29 AM
692 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice
- 30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM
551 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance
- 30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM
618 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes.
- 30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM
568 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health
- 29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM
677 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation
- 29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM
774 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people
- 29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM
592 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references
- 30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM
597 Views
i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM
659 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM
706 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM
723 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM
712 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM
670 Views
Interesting...
- 01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM
602 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM*
- 30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM
262 Views

*NM*
*NM*