Insofar as I don't believe we're doing anything to cover the uninsured, I must agree with that statement. ALthough in fairness, we do already have a number of systems in place on the matter, and nobody has to worry about bleeding to death because they are broke.
The point is, the statement above is basically as misleading as the flawed WHO study. True, no one has to worry about bleeding to death because they are broke, but how many millions in the US forgo medication, proper preventative care, medical advice and etc and etc and etc, because they can't afford it? A couple of cases in point from my own personal experience.
There is a family that lives several houses down from me. Parents, three kids and grandmother. The wife had high blood pressure. Husband lost job and the wife's medical insurance was of the "catastrophic intervention" type. They couldn't afford better, so she stopped taking the medication she couldn't afford. She died two weeks ago of a stroke, she was 37.
I have health insurance, it's OK, not great. It pays $35/mo for medication, all other medication expenses come out of my pocket. I'm 60, and have slightly high blood pressure and slightly high blood sugar. My out of pocket medication costs are well over 100/month. To keep costs down, I test my blood sugar twice every other day instead of the recommended twice a day. I can take my own blood pressure and frequently skip my blood pressure medication if it's not "too high". I'm not as bad as my neighbor Sylvia was, but I'm still "rationing" my care due to monetary restraints.
Sylvia wasn't "bleeding to death" but she's still dead because they couldn't afford decent health care.
NaCl(and there are millions and millions and millions like us)H2O
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan 
- 29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
900 Views
- 29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
900 Views
I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts
- 29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM
618 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped.....
- 29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM
627 Views
Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased
- 29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
721 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
- 29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM
624 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
- 29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM
798 Views
*NM*
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
- 29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM
563 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
- 29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM
683 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
- 29/09/2009 11:40:42 PM
723 Views
his statements on health care are precisely my point, but much more well stated. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 11:54:29 PM
268 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
- 29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM
673 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
- 30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM
658 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM*
- 30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM
261 Views
That's indisbutable
- 30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM
654 Views
It doesn't work at all
- 30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM
689 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care
- 30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM
703 Views
When the malpractice insurance can cost well over $100k a year of course it effects the costs.
- 30/09/2009 06:21:29 AM
692 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice
- 30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM
552 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance
- 30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM
618 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes.
- 30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM
568 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health
- 29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM
677 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation
- 29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM
774 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people
- 29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM
592 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references
- 30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM
597 Views
i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM
659 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM
706 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM
725 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM
712 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM
670 Views
Interesting...
- 01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM
603 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM*
- 30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM
262 Views
*NM*