Active Users:336 Time:17/06/2025 10:02:21 AM
Well played wooly Send a noteboard - 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM

View original post
View original post
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'

After all the internet is just electrons they don't actually print anything and the founders of our country could not conceive of such a medium...


However, the point I was trying to make is that this is a black and white issue for so many on the NRA side. Many (in fact, a large majority) don't see it that way. We can legislate this without violating the constitution.

Reply to message
Just to be clear... - 20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM 1205 Views
Of course it is - 20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM 600 Views
But, they is us - 23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM 776 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it - 23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM 813 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet - 20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM 724 Views
ROFL *NM* - 20/04/2013 05:21:11 AM 310 Views
Bazinga! Well done..... *NM* - 21/04/2013 03:24:34 PM 300 Views
Well played - 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM 863 Views
No you really can't - 23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM 768 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM* - 26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM 309 Views
How so? It made sense to me - 26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM 606 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution. - 26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM 643 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind - 26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM 849 Views
So is your post. - 28/04/2013 08:41:16 AM 630 Views
I'm not sure how - 28/04/2013 02:46:00 PM 660 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious. - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM 673 Views
yes *NM* - 20/04/2013 06:26:27 AM 382 Views
Same. Willing to hear counterarguments, though. *NM* - 21/04/2013 02:59:33 PM 373 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal. - 21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM 833 Views
Yep - 23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM 835 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness - 23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM 699 Views
You're smarter than this - 23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM 616 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well - 24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM 728 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play - 24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM 681 Views
And that reply makes my point - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 744 Views
And that reply makes my point - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 753 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM* - 22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM 266 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens? - 23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM 740 Views
freedom os speech can be a dangerous thing - 23/04/2013 04:58:02 AM 627 Views
As you know - 28/04/2013 12:11:04 PM 706 Views
Why yes, yes I do... - 23/04/2013 05:43:29 PM 760 Views
I agree - 28/04/2013 12:55:13 PM 828 Views
Re: I agree - 05/05/2013 11:24:37 AM 724 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing - 04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM 868 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points - 04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM 4923 Views
That's not true at all. - 05/05/2013 09:45:17 AM 604 Views
*I* have a complex about dead threads? - 05/05/2013 10:36:15 AM 726 Views

Reply to Message