Active Users:701 Time:03/08/2025 05:06:57 AM
Well played wooly Send a noteboard - 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM

View original post
View original post
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'

After all the internet is just electrons they don't actually print anything and the founders of our country could not conceive of such a medium...


However, the point I was trying to make is that this is a black and white issue for so many on the NRA side. Many (in fact, a large majority) don't see it that way. We can legislate this without violating the constitution.

Reply to message
Just to be clear... - 20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM 1223 Views
Of course it is - 20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM 615 Views
But, they is us - 23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM 790 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it - 23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM 830 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet - 20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM 741 Views
ROFL *NM* - 20/04/2013 05:21:11 AM 315 Views
Bazinga! Well done..... *NM* - 21/04/2013 03:24:34 PM 305 Views
Well played - 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM 881 Views
No you really can't - 23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM 785 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM* - 26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM 314 Views
How so? It made sense to me - 26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM 619 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution. - 26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM 663 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind - 26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM 867 Views
So is your post. - 28/04/2013 08:41:16 AM 648 Views
I'm not sure how - 28/04/2013 02:46:00 PM 674 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious. - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM 690 Views
yes *NM* - 20/04/2013 06:26:27 AM 389 Views
Same. Willing to hear counterarguments, though. *NM* - 21/04/2013 02:59:33 PM 386 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal. - 21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM 849 Views
Yep - 23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM 852 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness - 23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM 718 Views
You're smarter than this - 23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM 632 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well - 24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM 745 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play - 24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM 701 Views
And that reply makes my point - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 767 Views
And that reply makes my point - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 771 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM* - 22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM 272 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens? - 23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM 757 Views
freedom os speech can be a dangerous thing - 23/04/2013 04:58:02 AM 644 Views
As you know - 28/04/2013 12:11:04 PM 724 Views
Why yes, yes I do... - 23/04/2013 05:43:29 PM 779 Views
I agree - 28/04/2013 12:55:13 PM 843 Views
Re: I agree - 05/05/2013 11:24:37 AM 743 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing - 04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM 888 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points - 04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM 4943 Views
That's not true at all. - 05/05/2013 09:45:17 AM 628 Views
*I* have a complex about dead threads? - 05/05/2013 10:36:15 AM 740 Views

Reply to Message