Active Users:337 Time:17/06/2025 10:01:37 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind Isaac Send a noteboard - 26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM

View original postThere are amendments which imply that concept, but that doesn't make it anything close to having a "basis" in the presumption of innocence. The idea that background checks would sow how infringe on the presumption of innocence is absolutely bizarre. That presumption applies to criminal trials—not to the interpretation of the Bill of Rights.

No, the words presumption of innocence aren't in there, they aren't new, it was in common law way back to the roman empire, and was already a regular feature of criminal law, its not some new thing they found one day. It is also clear as day by the very nature of the 4th and 6th amendments. Are you taking the stance that the did not favor that?

Now I say pedantic to be kind because your comment was 'incomprehensible', and if you find the notion that presumption of innocence isn't a core principle of the constitution so alien as to be beyond your ability to comprehend, even if you disagree, you're going the opposite route of pedantic into 'dumb remark'

So next time, skip the insulting hyperbole minus any justifying commentary and just say "presumption of innocence isn't explicitly listed in the Constitution, and has limited application outside of criminal law" rather than acting like he said "The Founder Fathers were deeply motivated by a belief that pigs should not be housed inside aboard naval vessels"

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Just to be clear... wooly - 20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM 1205 Views
Of course it is A Deathwatch Guard - 20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM 600 Views
But, they is us wooly - 23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM 776 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it A Deathwatch Guard - 23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM 813 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet HyogaRott - 20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM 724 Views
ROFL *NM* Isaac - 20/04/2013 05:21:11 AM 310 Views
Bazinga! Well done..... *NM* Anonymous2000 - 21/04/2013 03:24:34 PM 300 Views
Well played wooly - 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM 862 Views
No you really can't HyogaRott - 23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM 768 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM 309 Views
How so? It made sense to me Isaac - 26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM 606 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution. Ghavrel - 26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM 643 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind Isaac - 26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM 849 Views
So is your post. Ghavrel - 28/04/2013 08:41:16 AM 630 Views
I'm not sure how Isaac - 28/04/2013 02:46:00 PM 660 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious. Sareitha Sedai - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM 673 Views
yes *NM* Roland00 - 20/04/2013 06:26:27 AM 382 Views
Same. Willing to hear counterarguments, though. *NM* Dan - 21/04/2013 02:59:33 PM 373 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal. random thoughts - 21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM 833 Views
the fact that 90% support it should be obvious that most see it as *a* solution moondog - 22/04/2013 05:32:42 PM 631 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:29:07 AM 724 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:29:13 AM 724 Views
Yep wooly - 23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM 835 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM 699 Views
You're smarter than this wooly - 23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM 616 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well random thoughts - 24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM 728 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play HyogaRott - 24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM 681 Views
And that reply makes my point random thoughts - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 744 Views
And that reply makes my point random thoughts - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 753 Views
The point is that background checks already exist on every commercial firearm transaction. HyogaRott - 27/04/2013 05:16:41 AM 776 Views
but we all know there is no correlation between having a gun and shooting someone with it moondog - 22/04/2013 05:30:12 PM 706 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM* HyogaRott - 22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM 266 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens? wooly - 23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM 740 Views
freedom os speech can be a dangerous thing random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:58:02 AM 627 Views
As you know nossy - 28/04/2013 12:11:04 PM 706 Views
Why yes, yes I do... HyogaRott - 23/04/2013 05:43:29 PM 760 Views
I agree nossy - 28/04/2013 12:55:13 PM 828 Views
Re: I agree Isaac - 05/05/2013 11:24:37 AM 724 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing imlad - 04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM 868 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points Isaac - 04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM 4923 Views
That's not true at all. nossy - 05/05/2013 09:45:17 AM 604 Views
*I* have a complex about dead threads? Isaac - 05/05/2013 10:36:15 AM 726 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes