Active Users:353 Time:17/06/2025 11:54:20 AM
So is your post. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 28/04/2013 08:41:16 AM

You're right; the sentence in question adheres to grammatical convention sufficiently to be legible. It is, however, incredibly absurd to say that the Founding Fathers would have opposed background checks because they go against the presumption of innocence in criminal affairs.

You do tone argument a lot, and you do it rather well, but it's a rather silly approach when it's all you ever do. And it's rapidly approaching all you ever do in your replies to me.

"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Just to be clear... - 20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM 1206 Views
Of course it is - 20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM 600 Views
But, they is us - 23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM 777 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it - 23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM 813 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet - 20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM 725 Views
ROFL *NM* - 20/04/2013 05:21:11 AM 310 Views
Bazinga! Well done..... *NM* - 21/04/2013 03:24:34 PM 300 Views
Well played - 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM 864 Views
No you really can't - 23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM 769 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM* - 26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM 309 Views
How so? It made sense to me - 26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM 606 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution. - 26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM 645 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind - 26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM 849 Views
So is your post. - 28/04/2013 08:41:16 AM 632 Views
I'm not sure how - 28/04/2013 02:46:00 PM 661 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious. - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM 674 Views
yes *NM* - 20/04/2013 06:26:27 AM 382 Views
Same. Willing to hear counterarguments, though. *NM* - 21/04/2013 02:59:33 PM 373 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal. - 21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM 834 Views
Yep - 23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM 836 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness - 23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM 700 Views
You're smarter than this - 23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM 618 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well - 24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM 729 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play - 24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM 682 Views
And that reply makes my point - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 746 Views
And that reply makes my point - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 755 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM* - 22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM 266 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens? - 23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM 742 Views
freedom os speech can be a dangerous thing - 23/04/2013 04:58:02 AM 628 Views
As you know - 28/04/2013 12:11:04 PM 708 Views
Why yes, yes I do... - 23/04/2013 05:43:29 PM 761 Views
I agree - 28/04/2013 12:55:13 PM 829 Views
Re: I agree - 05/05/2013 11:24:37 AM 725 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing - 04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM 869 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points - 04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM 4924 Views
That's not true at all. - 05/05/2013 09:45:17 AM 605 Views
*I* have a complex about dead threads? - 05/05/2013 10:36:15 AM 727 Views

Reply to Message