I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious.
Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM
View original post
Our Constitution has a basis in the presumption of innocence. Requiring background checks, before utalizing a Right that the Constitution states "shall not be infringed" reverses that presumption.
Our Constitution has a basis in the presumption of innocence. Requiring background checks, before utalizing a Right that the Constitution states "shall not be infringed" reverses that presumption.
---
I understand WHY folks might be inclined to favor such a restriction, but it is against the plain language of our Constitution.
(Bolding mine)
The "plain language" of the amendment itself begins with, A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state... How do you personally reconcile that bit with the bit you quoted?
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Just to be clear...
- 20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM
1299 Views
Of course it is
- 20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM
686 Views
But, they is us
- 23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM
867 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it
- 23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM
908 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet
- 20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM
821 Views
Well played 
- 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM
962 Views
- 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM
962 Views
No you really can't
- 23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM
863 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM*
- 26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM
347 Views
How so? It made sense to me
- 26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM
690 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution.
- 26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM
739 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind
- 26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM
938 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious.
- 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM
763 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal.
- 21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM
931 Views
the fact that 90% support it should be obvious that most see it as *a* solution
- 22/04/2013 05:32:42 PM
721 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
- 23/04/2013 04:29:07 AM
821 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
- 23/04/2013 04:29:13 AM
807 Views
Yep
- 23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM
933 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness
- 23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM
790 Views
You're smarter than this
- 23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM
715 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well
- 24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM
826 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play
- 24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM
776 Views
And that reply makes my point
- 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM
848 Views
The point is that background checks already exist on every commercial firearm transaction.
- 27/04/2013 05:16:41 AM
869 Views
but we all know there is no correlation between having a gun and shooting someone with it
- 22/04/2013 05:30:12 PM
806 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM*
- 22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM
304 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens?
- 23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM
848 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing
- 04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM
969 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points
- 04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM
5024 Views
