Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM
Not that are not a fair number of Rand Paul supporters that voted Obama in 2008 and whose biggest issue is anti-government and pro-pot but that really has nothing to do with what I said. The idea that Obama can lay this at feet of the republicans by just crying "obstructionism" and throwing in hands in the air is an idea from the loony left. This is a way to test the theory, if anyone on MSNBC put the idea forward you can no it come the fact free land of the far left.
So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 04:31:07 PM
1425 Views
Re: So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 10:43:15 PM
986 Views
I think you're wrong.
- 30/08/2013 04:44:53 AM
959 Views
I don't really care
- 30/08/2013 10:35:55 AM
951 Views
You can't effectively bomb Chemical and biological weapons stockpiles without using a nuke.
- 30/08/2013 02:01:38 PM
978 Views
Looks like the buck inexplicably stops at Congress
- 31/08/2013 11:23:20 PM
889 Views
Well it sets a good precedent anyway
- 01/09/2013 12:13:05 AM
859 Views
Unsure; I like the War Powers Resolution approach, though I am unsure of its constitutionality.
- 01/09/2013 01:49:15 AM
1092 Views
Nice theory, to bad it is crap
- 01/09/2013 06:23:31 PM
927 Views
Again, Rand Paul is loony left now?
- 01/09/2013 10:15:17 PM
1129 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM
1031 Views
Rand Paul=/=MSNBC
- 02/09/2013 09:30:50 PM
922 Views
No... not quite. Youre really are quite skilled at missing the point aren't you?
- 02/09/2013 11:20:02 PM
941 Views
Oh, no, I got the point.
- 03/09/2013 01:48:01 AM
944 Views
The only "point" you have is the talking points, and you hit them all, facts be damned. *NM*
- 03/09/2013 02:56:06 AM
372 Views
Considering the WPRs constitutionality and agreeing Obama is being cowardly are not talking points.
- 03/09/2013 03:52:44 AM
1039 Views
Re: Considering the WPRs ... talking points. (had to snip it due to length)
- 03/09/2013 05:49:08 PM
982 Views
"The only 'point' you have is the talking points...;" clearly those were not the sole points,
- 03/09/2013 10:08:43 PM
998 Views
Nah, I'm good, I've said what I wanted. I'm sure we'll get the opportunity to disagree again 
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
1020 Views
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
1020 Views
Fox and Joe Lieberman=/=MSNBC either.
- 02/09/2013 10:21:16 PM
1061 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 03/09/2013 01:17:29 AM
854 Views
Paul is saying what he always has: The commander-in-chief needs Congress' permission to command
- 03/09/2013 02:08:34 AM
876 Views
I see what the problem is
- 04/09/2013 01:07:08 PM
900 Views
More like the left hive does not know what the right hive is doing; Republicans are NOT cat herders.
- 04/09/2013 09:57:07 PM
971 Views
Yeah, I don't like any of it.
- 01/09/2013 12:40:35 AM
877 Views
Glad to hear you think he should more like Bush and asked congrees first
- 01/09/2013 06:27:03 PM
855 Views
How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 05:01:13 AM
958 Views
Re: How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 04:06:13 PM
988 Views
To be fair, that was what the American people said in 1940
- 02/09/2013 05:19:46 AM
886 Views
That comparison is not valid.
- 05/09/2013 09:25:38 PM
926 Views
Again, "I am not saying this situation is remotely like that one."
- 05/09/2013 10:48:39 PM
887 Views