Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 03/09/2013 01:17:29 AM
Please point to how what they are saying matches what you are saying. By the way the WH is claiming that they don't need the approval of congress to act so it will be hard to claim later that he was bound by congress. Hell he bombs other countries on regular basis without congressional approval. He even bomber the moon.
So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 04:31:07 PM
1401 Views
Re: So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 10:43:15 PM
962 Views
I think you're wrong.
- 30/08/2013 04:44:53 AM
926 Views
I don't really care
- 30/08/2013 10:35:55 AM
921 Views
You can't effectively bomb Chemical and biological weapons stockpiles without using a nuke.
- 30/08/2013 02:01:38 PM
947 Views
Looks like the buck inexplicably stops at Congress
- 31/08/2013 11:23:20 PM
859 Views
Well it sets a good precedent anyway
- 01/09/2013 12:13:05 AM
832 Views
Unsure; I like the War Powers Resolution approach, though I am unsure of its constitutionality.
- 01/09/2013 01:49:15 AM
1060 Views
Nice theory, to bad it is crap
- 01/09/2013 06:23:31 PM
899 Views
Again, Rand Paul is loony left now?
- 01/09/2013 10:15:17 PM
1094 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM
1001 Views
Rand Paul=/=MSNBC
- 02/09/2013 09:30:50 PM
886 Views
No... not quite. Youre really are quite skilled at missing the point aren't you?
- 02/09/2013 11:20:02 PM
910 Views
Oh, no, I got the point.
- 03/09/2013 01:48:01 AM
912 Views
The only "point" you have is the talking points, and you hit them all, facts be damned. *NM*
- 03/09/2013 02:56:06 AM
361 Views
Considering the WPRs constitutionality and agreeing Obama is being cowardly are not talking points.
- 03/09/2013 03:52:44 AM
1006 Views
Re: Considering the WPRs ... talking points. (had to snip it due to length)
- 03/09/2013 05:49:08 PM
947 Views
"The only 'point' you have is the talking points...;" clearly those were not the sole points,
- 03/09/2013 10:08:43 PM
968 Views
Nah, I'm good, I've said what I wanted. I'm sure we'll get the opportunity to disagree again 
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
998 Views
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
998 Views
Fox and Joe Lieberman=/=MSNBC either.
- 02/09/2013 10:21:16 PM
1037 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 03/09/2013 01:17:29 AM
825 Views
Paul is saying what he always has: The commander-in-chief needs Congress' permission to command
- 03/09/2013 02:08:34 AM
838 Views
I see what the problem is
- 04/09/2013 01:07:08 PM
864 Views
More like the left hive does not know what the right hive is doing; Republicans are NOT cat herders.
- 04/09/2013 09:57:07 PM
939 Views
Yeah, I don't like any of it.
- 01/09/2013 12:40:35 AM
852 Views
Glad to hear you think he should more like Bush and asked congrees first
- 01/09/2013 06:27:03 PM
827 Views
How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 05:01:13 AM
916 Views
Re: How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 04:06:13 PM
956 Views
To be fair, that was what the American people said in 1940
- 02/09/2013 05:19:46 AM
855 Views
That comparison is not valid.
- 05/09/2013 09:25:38 PM
889 Views
Again, "I am not saying this situation is remotely like that one."
- 05/09/2013 10:48:39 PM
850 Views