Active Users:373 Time:03/05/2024 09:50:15 AM
I think you're misunderstanding the problem. It's not a question of being "offended" beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 06/05/2014 02:43:26 PM

View original post
Grow-up! If you don't want to say "under God" in the pledge, don't. If you don't want to participate in a prayer, don't. Problem solved.

The problem isn't "being offended," or being forced to take part in a prayer you don't believe in. The problem is that something like "under god," or an opening prayer, legitimizes the assumption that religion has a place in the government.

It's less of an issue if you're in Congress, and they fly in an imam one week, a Jesuit the next, and a Baptist after that.

But if you live in a relatively small town? Where everything is closed on Sunday morning because 80% of the population is at church? And then you have a town hall meeting, and you want to open with a prayer because, hey, we're all God-fearing, good Christians in this town, right? So you invite the local pastor to open with a prayer, and then get to business about zoning regulations or whatever, with no mention of religion afterward.

Which sounds fine, until a few months/years/decades down the road when it's time to vote about gay marriage, or allowing teenagers to dance, or whatever.



I'm not "offended," and I don't think I'm going to be held down by guards and be forced to pray. But stuff like this contributes to the idea of "Well, America has separation of church and state, but we're all Christians, right?"

I amuse myself.
Reply to message
SCOTUS - Time to pray at Town Council meetings! - 05/05/2014 06:54:56 PM 902 Views
I'm agnostic but I think they made the right decision - 05/05/2014 08:09:21 PM 511 Views
Yeah, pretty much how I feel *NM* - 06/05/2014 12:27:22 AM 223 Views
Absolutely.....I'm not religious, but I love this decision..... - 06/05/2014 02:36:29 AM 454 Views
I think you're misunderstanding the problem. It's not a question of being "offended" - 06/05/2014 02:43:26 PM 422 Views
But look at what you're advocating for... - 06/05/2014 10:55:56 PM 432 Views
let's not go to extremes - 07/05/2014 12:33:38 AM 428 Views
please point out where constitution calls for a separation of church and state - 07/05/2014 06:44:42 PM 433 Views
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...." - 08/05/2014 12:37:06 AM 390 Views
so the answer no you can't - 08/05/2014 04:50:26 AM 405 Views
Again- it's not about being offended - 07/05/2014 04:02:29 AM 475 Views
America doesn't have seperation of church and state it has freedom of relgion - 07/05/2014 06:42:19 PM 427 Views
Not exactly. - 07/05/2014 07:01:23 PM 423 Views
The words are clear and the intent is well documented - 08/05/2014 05:13:42 AM 429 Views
Yeah, seems sensible. - 05/05/2014 10:08:39 PM 447 Views
Re: Yeah, seems sensible. - 06/05/2014 07:04:01 PM 430 Views
our Constitution expressly prohibits the establishment of religion by government, though - 06/05/2014 09:20:19 PM 419 Views
I couldn't disagree more... - 06/05/2014 10:50:19 PM 431 Views
bad analogy - 07/05/2014 12:19:26 AM 432 Views
But the GOVERNMENT is participating/supporting - 07/05/2014 04:17:32 AM 418 Views
Yeah, I'm aware. - 07/05/2014 07:03:36 AM 430 Views
That's not unreasonable - 06/05/2014 08:01:48 AM 487 Views
There's plenty that I don't want.... - 06/05/2014 10:57:41 PM 469 Views
In Keeping With Tradition Is Terrible Justification - 08/05/2014 03:37:34 AM 451 Views

Reply to Message