Active Users:1089 Time:17/07/2026 07:43:39 AM
Re: "Proportions, man." Nebhead Send a noteboard - 05/12/2014 03:34:16 PM

View original post
Well, yes, it is all about proportions.

Blacks killed by police: 123 = 27.4% of those killed
Whites killed by police: 326 = 72.6% of those killed


According to FBI stats:

"69.3 percent of all individuals arrested were white, 28.1 percent were black, and 2.6 percent were of other races."

So, it looks like there is a very close correlation between how much your "group" has crime-related contact with the police and you being killed by them.

Are police "overkilling" people? Probably. Does it look related to race, at least from THESE stats? No.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States

Around about 13-14% of the US population is black. The stats you show above mean that black people are both arrested (28.1%), and killed by police (27.4%), about twice as often as white people.

Comparing the actual numbers against each other is meaningless unless you take them as a proportion of total population.

It's all my fault...
Vegas Aug 17-18 - A Night to Remember

signature_images/100.gif
Spoony made this aaaages ago for me. Never got to use it though... until now!
Reply to message
New York cop pushes black man's face into pavement and chokes him to death for selling cigerettes - 04/12/2014 12:03:54 AM 1522 Views
What does his color have to do with anything? - 04/12/2014 07:37:08 AM 994 Views
A short answer for your long post - 04/12/2014 04:43:12 PM 852 Views
123 blacks shot to death by cops in 2012; 326 whites. - 05/12/2014 12:40:56 AM 969 Views
These numbers make me angry. - 05/12/2014 05:39:26 AM 827 Views
I hate these stats, so misleading. Only 13% of the US population is black! - 05/12/2014 02:02:18 PM 1015 Views
"Proportions, man." - 05/12/2014 02:28:23 PM 791 Views
math is hard - 05/12/2014 02:45:08 PM 887 Views
It doesn't matter why. - 05/12/2014 03:19:54 PM 1023 Views
it does to me. - 05/12/2014 03:52:01 PM 849 Views
Dangerous territories when you talk socioeconomics - 05/12/2014 04:08:57 PM 792 Views
Danger is my middle name. *NM* - 05/12/2014 04:47:23 PM 436 Views
But that's a completely separate issue than the one that the post is talking about. - 05/12/2014 05:12:44 PM 970 Views
Heh, yes. Because none of us ever adds layers to these posts. Ever. - 05/12/2014 07:34:04 PM 896 Views
That is SUCH A BAD SENTENCE. - 05/12/2014 08:07:18 PM 862 Views
I'm not Tom - 05/12/2014 10:13:43 PM 804 Views
Thus spake Patsy Stone! - 05/12/2014 10:15:44 PM 809 Views
Sweetie Darling - 05/12/2014 10:16:34 PM 690 Views
Okay. I can agree that we do go on tangents. - 05/12/2014 10:23:21 PM 1118 Views
Re: "Proportions, man." - 05/12/2014 03:34:16 PM 1063 Views
So what you have implied here then is that - 05/12/2014 04:05:10 PM 855 Views
That's a fair assumption to make *shrug* *NM* - 07/12/2014 05:35:59 PM 555 Views
And now you're the one doing exactly what you implied Cannoli was doing. - 05/12/2014 05:17:25 PM 799 Views
...I'm doing no such thing. - 07/12/2014 05:27:13 PM 957 Views
L-Dog is right, you are wrong, look at the proportion of crimes committed..... - 05/12/2014 06:30:29 PM 850 Views
Erm, no. - 07/12/2014 05:34:38 PM 1060 Views
Unbelievable. I have no words... *NM* - 04/12/2014 10:15:32 AM 651 Views
he was not choked to death and he was not choked for selling cigerettes - 04/12/2014 02:28:44 PM 823 Views
I mean, "Killed him without intent" is pretty much the definition of manslaughter, isn't it? *NM* - 04/12/2014 04:44:18 PM 448 Views
sorry but it isn't - 04/12/2014 05:54:27 PM 766 Views
did you actually watch the video of his death? - 04/12/2014 06:30:26 PM 869 Views
OK watched it all the way. Which one of my conclusions were suppossed to change? - 04/12/2014 07:39:07 PM 721 Views
sorry, i mistook you for a human capable of compassion. my mistake - 04/12/2014 07:47:35 PM 790 Views
Don't worry I don't mistaake you for someone capable of rational thought - 04/12/2014 10:56:44 PM 726 Views

Reply to Message